Author Topic: Review the latest movie you have seen  (Read 190236 times)

Offline Zoologic

  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 4.141
  • In FH Since 0.67
    • View Profile
Re: Review the latest movie you have seen
« Reply #1740 on: 24-05-2014, 17:05:02 »
Yup, I also watched that Godzilla (2014) 2 weeks ago and was dissapointed.

Simply put, it is a US military fest.

Pros:
It featured Breaking Bad actor. He performs really well, I was emotionally taken by his expression of grief/frustration/despair.
Military porn. Probably a US Navy/Army recruitment ads, the only thing they can peacefully co-exist. Also no Marines here. Glorious slaughter of military personnel, showing courage under perilous situation.
Monster fights! I grew up watching Ultraman series, as dumb as it is. And this movie brings it back with a lot of cosmetics: awesome!
More than one awesome giant monsters. Godzilla vs. Muto
Lotsa destruction, beautifully rendered. Realistically, Russians will be overjoyed, their lose are minor in the movie, but the US will never recover with that amount of destruction.
Some moments of suspense. Yeah, the monster is huge, you can't really think of playing cat-and-mouse with a prey of that size.

Cons:
Incoherent plot, characters change behavior/organization change policy abruptly just to suit the story development.
Inconsistency: arbitrary change of rules, monster can do this to an object at this radius. But when the plot calls for awesome HALO paradrop with flares, the plane bypasses the rule. This includes commo, laser sights, and many other military gear that conveniently obey and disobey this rule so many times. It kills all the realism build-up, told from the beginning of the story (where they try to connect real world events with the movie storyline).
There is a Japanese actor in it, Ken Watanabe, doing Japanese impression of acting when it is not a Kabuki: expressionless and basically being the most useless knowledgeable character there all along.
So much factual errors. Watching it once is enough to spot it, they are so obvious.
Too many unused potential. I don't know whether the theme is about duty vs family, nature vs human, or overwhelming odds vs bravery. But none of them pass the mark, they all fall short before the climax.
Still ridden with Hollywood cliches: you'll know how all of this ended.

Overall, it is a movie that tries to be a lot of things but ended up being a trainwreck. The 1998 Godzilla at least was put together very well despite being equally ugly.

I give it 6.5/10 for the massive amount of destruction they showed us. Also, in this movie, they try to nod a lot of time to the original 1954 Gojira. So yeah, it is an American movies "coolifying" classic Japanese movies. I'd say, it works much better as the original Toho Studios' homage, than the Transformers 3 (Dark Side of The Moon) trying to be the original G1.
« Last Edit: 24-05-2014, 17:05:48 by Zoologic »

Offline Zoologic

  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 4.141
  • In FH Since 0.67
    • View Profile
Re: Review the latest movie you have seen
« Reply #1741 on: 24-05-2014, 19:05:03 »
Today, I've just seen

X-Men: Days of Future Past (2014) by Bryan Singer
Based on the comic book of same title.

Starring Hugh Jackman (who brought Wolverine into prominence), James McAvoy, Michael Fassbender, Jennifer Lawrence, Ellen Page, Halle Berry, Nicholas Hoult, Shawn Ashmore, Omar Sy, Fan Bingbing, holy shit it has an ensemble cast alright.

Days of Future Past tries to reconnect the X-Men of the original trilogy and the First Class. This involves complex things such as time-travel, which is applied to the story using the simple single-universe string theory. So whatever happens in the past, it will affect the future in a single time-space continuum. But the movie disobeyed so many rules, like the continuum itself.

In the grim future, mutants are being hunted to near extinction by the Sentinels, a robot designed to hunt them down by using various advanced technology derived from the mutant powers itself. So naturally they were losing. Then the Sentinels attacked humans as well, because of the gene's ability to mutate. This unites mankind and mutants, but they are still powerless. The remaining X-Men, united and tries to prevent the Sentinels program from happening by changing the history. Their mission is to prevent the critical event where the present future is decided from happening.

The Verdict
Anyway, the movie features a lot of fight, grand scene of "artistic" destruction, and superhero thing. And there is Peter Dinklage, who played that dwarf Lannister, whose acting is quite convincing in this movie. Basically, there is not much mistake to be immediately spotted, other than the abuse of plot device (time travel). It is not known whether this movie takes place after The Wolverine (2013), where in the ending credit scene, Wolverine were asked by both Prof. X and Magneto to discuss something important (this movie).

Like all X-Men movie franchise, it is typically dull in character development, because you have to get used to a lot of them. For the first time audience, you'll see that these good guys are just there to be slaughtered, their futile efforts just don't make sense. However, overall, as a non-comic book reading guy (but animated series watcher), I think this is the best X-Men movie in the whole series, more grown up, more serious, and quite decent amount of comic effects. I like the jokes.

All in all, 8/10, a great (non-dark) superhero movie, but not at The Avengers (2012) level yet. But, when you are tasked to patch up 6 almost irrelevant movies in the franchise with differing qualities from the last 14 years and managed to do this well, I think Bryan Singer and the script writers deserve special award for that. They succeeded at what Star Wars Episode III (2005) failed big time.

Offline THeTA0123

  • The north remembers
  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 16.842
    • View Profile
Re: Review the latest movie you have seen
« Reply #1742 on: 04-06-2014, 00:06:22 »
X men days of the future past

My review is kinda simular to that of Zoologic. A solid 8/10. Well deserved.

+1 for jennifer lawrence's performance as Raven/mystique
-i am fairly sure that if they took porn off the internet, there would only be one website left and it would be called bring back the porn "Perry cox, Scrubs.

Offline Zoologic

  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 4.141
  • In FH Since 0.67
    • View Profile
Re: Review the latest movie you have seen
« Reply #1743 on: 14-06-2014, 19:06:38 »
Edge of Tomorrow (2014)
by Doug Liman
Starring Tom Cruise, Emily Blunt, Bill Paxton, and else.

Plot/Background
Aliens, Tom Cruise. OK, enough with his personal belief.
Anyway, it is a classic invasion movies. The beginning credit features a lot of newscasts from various real world media about the impending invasion from mysterious alien that landed in Hamburg. It then captures the whole Europe in similar fashion and outreach as the Nazi Germany back in WW2 (as shown in the map).

The alien is called mimic, semi-metallic creature with a lot of tendrils, very blindingly quick. Humans fight them with powered exoskeleton suit. They referenced Verdun, where a Samus Aran-like hero chic Rita Vrataski (which director Doug Liman says "Joan of Arc"-like) made her fame. Emily Blunt played her, complete with the sexy British accent.

Tom Cruise is Major William Cage, a US Army officer, now in UDF joint forces created by NATO to retake the mainland Europe. He is propagandist guy with not combat experience, and somehow are thrown into an all-out invasion of Europe, through the French coastlines. It is unclear why, because the plot fucks all logic, including the comical WW2 Normandy invasion repeat.
A supposedly unexpected landing was met with fierce resistance from the mimics, tearing up the soldiers landing on the beach. Cage, being inexperienced died after giving everything he had. But then he wakes up at the base, on the previous day, giving the impression that it was just a dream.
But he will soon find out what really happened and has to save the humanity with his experience and newfound power.

[SPOILER ALERT]
When he died in the first day at the beach, Cage's suicide killed an unusually large mimic using claymore mine explosion, ripping the mimic and Cage's body apart, therefore allowing their blood to mix together. This large mimic is called Alpha, and has the power of the mimic's hivemind brain, which is to reset time. The mixing of the blood, allowed Cage to conveniently resets time when he dies.
Sessions after sessions of repeat, from the main base at Heathrow to the French beach, he finally connects with Vrataski "Angel of Verdun." Together they overcome their gaming session with greater dexterity and experience. Joined by Dr. Carter (Noah Taylor), a scientist deemed lunatic by the UDF officials, they solve the puzzle on how to permanently defeat the mimics using their own power. Along with keeping up with the consequences of repeating your life numerous time while retaining your consciousness from the previous session.


Review

It is gamey-like, an action platformer. But that alone is a major spoiler, just like the tagline "Live-Die-Repeat." You are given a setting where you can be a game player, without the risk of leaving this world forever when you die, because there is a save point somewhere in the life which you can't decide exactly where. That's the main plot device in this movie.

Silly setting and background aside, the movie is a solid entertainer. Action, suspense, comedy, drama, love story. It is a complete movie in action game-based theme package. A total nerdfest. It must be a total blast for generally nerdy-positive 2014 movie goers. But it is also engaging for more mature audiences as well, because it contains some good amount of drama.

Personally, I think the movie is silly, a lot of plot holes, questionable military judgment, and forcefully thrown in plot devices (Tom Cruise's power). But like Pacific Rim and other movies with weak plots and storyline, it manages to polish the weakness with good acting and balanced amount of final editing. Re-watching all of the sequences of Tom Cruises' gaming sessions with his lives is surprisingly not boring here. We were made to imagine that he must have gone through +1,000 boring live-die-repeat and still manage to put his sanity together. Good job. Any gamers would have cheated half way through the attempts.

Verdict

It must be very difficult to tell such a complex story in less than 3 hours. The scene selections, the cutting, the editing is very brilliant. It doesn't require massive amount of intelligence to fully understand the whole plot concept, a rare thing in post-2010 movies. I give it a generous 7.5/10.

As a military hobbyist, you can't set aside those gaping stupidity of the whole invasion idea.

Offline Zoologic

  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 4.141
  • In FH Since 0.67
    • View Profile
Re: Review the latest movie you have seen
« Reply #1744 on: 28-06-2014, 15:06:48 »
Transformers: Age of Extinction (2014)
by Michael Bay

Starring Mark Wahlberg, Nicola Peltz, Stanley Tucci, Kelsey Grammer,

1. There is no other movie that conveniently placed its product so prominent like Transformers: Age of Extinction. I see: Bud Light requires Mark to take a drink before scaring some random guy who arbitrarily (in contrast to typical movie bystander rule) engages with the hero for no reason, New Camaro requires bumblebee to pose static for a while on the way to a rescue mission, some Chinese mineral water needs some focused shots, Stanley Tucci needs to calm down by drinking some Chinese milk in a carton that requires the camera to be panned slightly down so we can see the brand. Oreo-bot taking unnecessary appearance out of the 2 hours 30 minutes. Trumpchi being chased by angry GM-brand cars and an Audi, also posing for a while to make sure that it is not a random Cadillac.

2. The story is good and intriguing, I know it is 2 hours and 30 minutes long, but Michael Bay cut scenes very abruptly before we can get the why the scene is supposed to be there. Some random government officials, couldn't care less break-in corporate HQ break-in attempt, Chinese defense ministry, a fundamental break-your-ride before you go along scene that doesn't catch up.

3. Comedy. Funny, but intense big robot fights shouldn't wait for someone to finish the funny line. They just need to force in that snarky line, but please insert that in a more appropriate time.

4. There is Drama too, like Daddy issues, teenage hormone-fueled love story, which is not seriously worked on, knowing that this is done by Michael Bay. I think he wanted Transformers: Age of Extinction to be silly but awesome, like Pacific Rim, but it tells too much background story, too much plot, too much things in a single packed movie. The packaging job is badly done.

5. Moar rich robot characterizations. Yes, they are aliens that confine themselves to the stereotypes of human (Hollywood) cultures. Which is great, but... I don't know why they bothered with all the make-believe realism tropes that US services are responsible to the president, Steve Jobs corporate caricature, CIA is really sinister, Texas has a specific law for underage dating, and the Chinese has an active government. Makes the whole thing sounds silly.

6. Glorious effects of giant robots vs robots, alien ships, and giant explosions, glorious gunfights... Less artistic than Godzilla or Pacific Rim, but more alive, since the robots have characters and there are plenty of them joining the action. Hollywood never let you down in this department, they are number one CGI producer in the world, hands down.

7. To enjoy it, treat it like children movie, a good two-part episodes of a single story in Transformers TV series made into one movie. It is good enough for that. Otherwise, you'll shed brain cells.

Verdict:
Artwork? Entertainment? Both? Well, more of an entertainment. Artwork here is in form of glorious CGI effects. I don't know whether the new transformation effects introduced in this movie cost less than the original one, but I see it like a cost saving.

Would settle for 5.5/10 for this movie. Watch it, but don't expect too much.

Offline th_battleaxe

  • Bon Vivant
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1.204
  • Bit of a Révolutionnaire
    • View Profile
Re: Review the latest movie you have seen
« Reply #1745 on: 04-08-2014, 17:08:28 »
I finally got to watch Iron Sky.

Pros: Palin's the President, and there are awesome Dr. Strangelove references.

Cons: ...

The movie gave me a good laugh, and the rewatch value is quite high. I probably missed hundreds of details. The North Korean guy was pure gold, though.

8/10
J'aime l'oignon, frît à l'huile
J'aime l'oignon car il est bon
J'aime l'oignon, frît à l'huile
J'aime l'oignon, j'aime l'oignon

Offline FORGOTTENKEVINOHOPE

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 527
    • View Profile
Re: Review the latest movie you have seen
« Reply #1746 on: 05-08-2014, 22:08:44 »
saw this last night =     http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2872732/


didn't really like the ending, but it was alright.... was hoping she would show some more skin too!

Offline MaJ.P.Bouras

  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 3.210
  • A Hellenic version of Jackie Chan.
    • View Profile
Re: Review the latest movie you have seen
« Reply #1747 on: 05-08-2014, 22:08:50 »
Something similar to the concept of Lucy is "Limitless". I watched it a couple of days ago and it had quite a nice story.

Offline Mud Buddha

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 844
    • View Profile
Re: Review the latest movie you have seen
« Reply #1748 on: 12-08-2014, 14:08:16 »
Just saw Lucy yesterday, cool movie. If Luc Besson ever made a philosophical arthouse picture I guess this is it. Expected a bit more of a straight up action flick, but kinda liked what I got. It's still no Leon, but hey, what is? ;-)


But came here to post this as a tribute to mister Williams, who despite making a ton of sub par movies, never failed to make me laugh:
http://www.businessinsider.com/robin-williams-kuwait-2014-8

"Williams was there for a USO tour for the soldiers, most of whom were either headed to Iraq or supporting combat troops already there. In the middle of a bit, Williams — and the thousands of troops in front him — hear a trumpet sound."






FH2 is the game, DarklyDreamingDexter is the name.

Offline THeTA0123

  • The north remembers
  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 16.842
    • View Profile
Re: Review the latest movie you have seen
« Reply #1749 on: 23-08-2014, 02:08:09 »
Guardians of the galaxy

9.5/10

Absolutely an incredibly hilarious marvel movie. One wich is stunning and imo, better then the avengers.
-i am fairly sure that if they took porn off the internet, there would only be one website left and it would be called bring back the porn "Perry cox, Scrubs.

Offline PanzerKnacker

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1.912
  • Tommyjäger
    • View Profile
Re: Review the latest movie you have seen
« Reply #1750 on: 27-08-2014, 03:08:54 »
Red tails (2012)

Holy shit. I have never, ever seen so much bullshit in one movie.
2 hours of my life wasted on a cgi wet dream of a WWII enthousiast.
I have to adress some things though:

1) Cheesy dialogue. Horrid.
2) Literal translation from german to english. "Macht kurzen Prozess mit den"?! Seriously?
3) 0.50cal machineguns act like 20mm cannons, 20 and 30mm cannons act like 7,92mm machineguns.
4) "Evil nazi supertrooper with a yellow nose on his plane" that magically started flying Me262
5) All B17s are shot down in the exact same way. You set the engine on fire, the wing breaks. Ta-daa
6) Bf262 and a Mustang P51D going heads on. A burst at least 5 seconds long from the 4x30mm guns only wounds the american pilot and "damages" the plane, while a 5 second burst from the 6x0.50cal machineguns BLOWS UP the damn airplane.


2/10 for making Bf109 Gs have 20mm gunpods, but only 2/10 because they made them shoot blanks.

God damn it.
He was not wrong. Amateurs talk tactics, pros talk logistics.

Offline Matthew_Baker

  • FH-Betatester
  • ***
  • Posts: 1.923
    • View Profile
Re: Review the latest movie you have seen
« Reply #1751 on: 27-08-2014, 06:08:02 »
Agreed on both counts
Red tails (2012)
[ranting]
2/10 God damn it.
that movie was just.... just awful

Guardians of the galaxy
9.5/10
Absolutely an incredibly hilarious marvel movie. One wich is stunning and imo, better then the avengers.

Best movie I've seen in theater all summer, hands down.

The Prestige 8/10
Great movie; keeps you on your toes and has a lot of thought provoking themes in it as well. A bit too twisty at the end. But Christopher Nolan knows how to tell a good story.
« Last Edit: 27-08-2014, 06:08:17 by Matthew_Baker »

Offline Kubador

  • FH-Betatester
  • ***
  • Posts: 1.531
  • Flippin' Warbears since 1988
    • View Profile
Re: Review the latest movie you have seen
« Reply #1752 on: 27-08-2014, 21:08:11 »
Prestige is one of those movies that gets better you see it second time and see all the little thing you missed the first time.

Offline Capten_C

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1.201
  • Well well well well well well well
    • View Profile
    • Youtube
Re: Review the latest movie you have seen
« Reply #1753 on: 27-08-2014, 22:08:58 »
Funnily enough I watched The Prestige last night. Enjoyed it, but in the Magic Movie category, for me it's not as superb at The Illusionist!  :)
LEGENDARY FORGOTTEN HOPE 2 ROUNDS!!! >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2xtJF9fL1YI

Offline Zoologic

  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 4.141
  • In FH Since 0.67
    • View Profile
Re: Review the latest movie you have seen
« Reply #1754 on: 07-09-2014, 14:09:41 »
Anyone notice how similar the main plot is between the Marvel's Guardians of the Galaxy and Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic?

Both really makes me want to play another game like it! Space ship, your hero party, and major evil character to tackle.