Author Topic: Would you be mad if no Pegasus or Omaha Beach were in 2.2??  (Read 10801 times)

Offline AdamPA1006

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 415
    • View Profile
Would you be mad? Honestly? I think Omaha has to be in for player counts sake. Normandy needs Omaha nuff said.

Offline Alakazou

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1.368
  • FHer from the beginning
    • View Profile
Re: Would you be mad if no Pegasus or Omaha Beach were in 2.2??
« Reply #1 on: 11-05-2009, 01:05:15 »
Not mad, but maybe a little bit disappointed. Nothing big.

Offline VonMudra

  • FH-Betatester
  • ***
  • Posts: 8.238
  • FH2 Betatester/Verdun Team Researcher
    • View Profile
Re: Would you be mad if no Pegasus or Omaha Beach were in 2.2??
« Reply #2 on: 11-05-2009, 01:05:35 »
I can almost guarentee we'll see Omaha.  Its Lobo's pet obsession.

As for pegusas, meh, I doubt many will miss it, though we will still want it eventually.  Before that can be done though, we would need a brit para model.

Offline flyboy_fx

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2.132
  • rockets,rc stuff,and collecting/making ww2 models
    • View Profile
Re: Would you be mad if no Pegasus or Omaha Beach were in 2.2??
« Reply #3 on: 11-05-2009, 01:05:39 »
well no Omaha i would be some made but if we have point du hoc im all fine.
I would rather have Omaha before Pegasus  
Don't hate the forum, hate it's users...


Offline Eat Uranium

  • Tea Drinker
  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 4.512
  • Today's news will contain [REDACTED]
    • View Profile
    • FH2 Music
Re: Would you be mad if no Pegasus or Omaha Beach were in 2.2??
« Reply #4 on: 11-05-2009, 01:05:45 »
I could live perfectly fine without either.  Especially Omaha.  Sure I'll play it when it gets made, but I won't miss it untill then.  For landing maps, give me PDH and Juno and I'll be happy.

Offline Schneider

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1.694
  • Ofw.Josef_Schneider
    • View Profile
Re: Would you be mad if no Pegasus or Omaha Beach were in 2.2??
« Reply #5 on: 11-05-2009, 01:05:44 »
I wouldn't miss Pegasus for sure. Omaha would be nice if it's portraited realistically.

Online Ts4EVER

  • Banner of THeTA0123
  • Developer
  • ******
  • Posts: 7.763
    • View Profile
Re: Would you be mad if no Pegasus or Omaha Beach were in 2.2??
« Reply #6 on: 11-05-2009, 01:05:06 »
dunno, there is only so much you can do with beach landing scenarios before it gets old. Point du Hoc is enough for now.

Offline Dukat

  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 4.041
    • View Profile
Re: Would you be mad if no Pegasus or Omaha Beach were in 2.2??
« Reply #7 on: 11-05-2009, 01:05:01 »
I would always accept unfinished content to be missing and added later by mapdownload, hotfix or patch in an exchange for more frequently game updates. Though current development progress seems to be already rather speedy after the initial developer warmup.

I usually imagine my own sounds with it, like `tjunk, tupdieyupdiedee` aaa enemy spotted, ratatatataboom

Offline Captain Pyjama Shark

  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 5.281
  • Captain of the Gravy Train
    • View Profile
Re: Would you be mad if no Pegasus or Omaha Beach were in 2.2??
« Reply #8 on: 11-05-2009, 02:05:09 »
I'd actually prefer Pegasus to Omaha, Pegasus is intense.

Offline Cory the Otter

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2.815
  • Smoke me a kipper, I'll be home for breakfast.
    • View Profile
    • FA Profile
Re: Would you be mad if no Pegasus or Omaha Beach were in 2.2??
« Reply #9 on: 11-05-2009, 02:05:11 »
I'd be mad. I love those maps.

Offline Mspfc Doc DuFresne

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 677
  • A Poet and I didn't Know It
    • View Profile
Re: Would you be mad if no Pegasus or Omaha Beach were in 2.2??
« Reply #10 on: 11-05-2009, 02:05:42 »
Pegasus is intense, one of my favorite maps. I may have lost my F|H Multiplayer Virginity to Pegasus. Either that or Breakthrough. Those times are so hazy now.

And Charlie Sector was an excellent team building exercise if the American team started to beat the crap out of the Germans. Probably my favorite map to win; not only is it satisfying to get revenge on those bunker babies defending those G*DD*MN SPR Bunkers and those F*CKING Nebelwerfers but is incredibly and disturbingly ...fulfilling to machine gun unsuspecting Germans in the back. (This is why Homer should never walk down a dark alley with me standing behind him holding a BAR)
Twilight - the movie is just like Schindler's list... You know you're watching a crime against humanity, but it's sort of entertaining.~~Ts4EVER

Offline Hockeywarrior

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 1.062
  • One of the superior 5-digit numbers
    • View Profile
Re: Would you be mad if no Pegasus or Omaha Beach were in 2.2??
« Reply #11 on: 11-05-2009, 07:05:14 »
Omaha pretty much as to be there, partly because everyone expects it and partly because I can't see Lobo living with himself if the team left it out even for the first release.

Check out my Red Orchestra, FH2, and shooting videos!
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQK9lbdAEi9mAM5iGfHoeyA

Offline DLFReporter

  • FH-Betatester
  • ***
  • Posts: 4.727
  • Betatesting FH2 makes me edgy...
    • View Profile
Re: Would you be mad if no Pegasus or Omaha Beach were in 2.2??
« Reply #12 on: 11-05-2009, 07:05:01 »
Lol what a feeble attempt at trying to cob the devs to reveal the other maps. ^^
Gravity is a habit that is hard to shake off

Offline Natty

  • Developer
  • ******
  • Posts: 3.170
    • View Profile
Re: Would you be mad if no Pegasus or Omaha Beach were in 2.2??
« Reply #13 on: 11-05-2009, 07:05:22 »
I may have lost my F|H Multiplayer Virginity to Pegasus.

You played Pegasus In Forgotten|Honor?  ???

Offline NTH

  • FH-Betatester
  • ***
  • Posts: 3.146
    • View Profile
Re: Would you be mad if no Pegasus or Omaha Beach were in 2.2??
« Reply #14 on: 11-05-2009, 08:05:03 »
I wouldn't say mad, but no Pegasus would leave a gaping hole in my FH heart  :'(
That map was made so well .


Milton Gault roared, "Roffey, I know bloody well that Jerry knows we are here but you don't need to advertise the fact!"
(From: First in the Field, Gault of the Patricias by Jeffery Williams, page 72.)