Author Topic: M45 Quad mount  (Read 11656 times)

Offline THeTA0123

  • The north remembers
  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 16.840
    • View Profile
Re: M45 Quad mount
« Reply #15 on: 24-09-2009, 11:09:07 »
Quote
Its true though. Many people wanna see all the gizmos the germans have, but if even one Allied thing is suggested, like i suggested the M16 Quad .50CAL, many people starting instanly starting to say it is Overpowerd
Yeah... I can't see this. Could you give some examples?
I'll search for my thread soon. I have another example on the old FH2 forums on filefront.

If they still exist...................
-i am fairly sure that if they took porn off the internet, there would only be one website left and it would be called bring back the porn "Perry cox, Scrubs.

Offline VonMudra

  • FH-Betatester
  • ***
  • Posts: 8.239
  • FH2 Betatester/Verdun Team Researcher
    • View Profile
Re: M45 Quad mount
« Reply #16 on: 24-09-2009, 18:09:35 »
The quad 50 would be cool, but if its put in, then the Wirbelwind should be given back its damn explosive power, otherwise it is nothing more now then a quad 50 with a slower rate of fire and less ammo....

I want it, but I still want THIS fixed.

Offline Fuchs

  • No lollygagging
  • FH-Betatester
  • ***
  • Posts: 6.654
  • Traction Wars Propaganda Officer
    • View Profile
    • Traction Wars - WWII Free to Play Game
Re: M45 Quad mount
« Reply #17 on: 24-09-2009, 18:09:05 »
I would like the Crusader AA versions, those look awesome.
"Force answers force, war breeds war, and death only brings death.
To break this vicious circle one must do more than act without thought or doubt."

Offline THeTA0123

  • The north remembers
  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 16.840
    • View Profile
Re: M45 Quad mount
« Reply #18 on: 24-09-2009, 21:09:40 »
The quad 50 would be cool, but if its put in, then the Wirbelwind should be given back its damn explosive power, otherwise it is nothing more now then a quad 50 with a slower rate of fire and less ammo....

I want it, but I still want THIS fixed.
I wouldnt mind this either. Ofcourse please not the Explosive radius of the bofors gun, but ye, anything in a 50CM radius should be hit
-i am fairly sure that if they took porn off the internet, there would only be one website left and it would be called bring back the porn "Perry cox, Scrubs.

Offline VonMudra

  • FH-Betatester
  • ***
  • Posts: 8.239
  • FH2 Betatester/Verdun Team Researcher
    • View Profile
Re: M45 Quad mount
« Reply #19 on: 24-09-2009, 21:09:41 »
It never was the bofors size explosion ingame, the shell is half the size of the bofor's gun ;)

Offline Raizok

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7
    • View Profile
Re: M45 Quad mount
« Reply #20 on: 24-09-2009, 21:09:58 »
It never was the bofors size explosion ingame, the shell is half the size of the bofor's gun ;)

Which means it should have around 1/8th of the explosive power, and hence circa 1/64 of lethal radius. Works for me.

Offline Havoc2090

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 86
    • View Profile
Re: M45 Quad mount
« Reply #21 on: 25-09-2009, 03:09:21 »
the only problem with Static AA on most maps, is you must lure the enemy fighter or bomber into your airspace or near your hq where most of your AA is and i know this is a good tactic n all...but who the hell would follow an enemy plane into his Airspace where their flak can get you and possibly other fighters!?.

I really do think the allies should have some mobile AA to at least give them a chance, i mean armoured columns get ripped to shreds by dive bombing stukas by not having any air cover its a tankers worst nightmare hearing that siren first minute your alive, last minute you are dead!, allies must have new equipment in FH2 as the germans already have powerful tanks "which dont bother me by the way!" because they can still be destroyed....im just thinking most people are leaning more towards the germans than the allies :/
We haven't the proper facilities to take you all prisoner! Sorry!, We'd like to, but we can't accept your surrender! Was there anything else? - Quote from A Bridge Too Far

Offline NoCoolOnesLeft

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 336
  • Allied Bias
    • View Profile
Re: M45 Quad mount
« Reply #22 on: 25-09-2009, 14:09:10 »
Any player who knows what he's doing would not use the siren on the Stuka. When you hear a siren people on the ground go nuts and disperse. Usually you wouldn't know you're dead until you are, if the pilot has the dive angle right, you can't hear him coming.

I use the siren because it's awesome. Dramatic effect for the win.

Offline Thorondor123

  • God Emperor
  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 6.573
  • Lugbûrz-ûr!
    • View Profile
Re: M45 Quad mount
« Reply #23 on: 25-09-2009, 14:09:56 »
Any player who knows what he's doing would not use the siren on the Stuka. When you hear a siren people on the ground go nuts and disperse. Usually you wouldn't know you're dead until you are, if the pilot has the dive angle right, you can't hear him coming.

When a tanker or a gunner hears the siren it's too late. They can't escape. 
Let mortal heroes sing your fame

Offline NTH

  • FH-Betatester
  • ***
  • Posts: 3.146
    • View Profile
Re: M45 Quad mount
« Reply #24 on: 25-09-2009, 15:09:59 »
I love the Stuka siren. It's the last thing those Tommie tankers hear .. ;D


Milton Gault roared, "Roffey, I know bloody well that Jerry knows we are here but you don't need to advertise the fact!"
(From: First in the Field, Gault of the Patricias by Jeffery Williams, page 72.)

Offline verg_6

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 122
  • Crusader MkIII for life (Until 2.2, that is)
    • View Profile
Re: M45 Quad mount
« Reply #25 on: 01-10-2009, 17:10:29 »
I love the Stuka siren. It's the last thing those Tommie tankers hear .. ;D
Back in the 2.2 days, I would sound that beast just to see the guys crap their pants. It is something to see infantry clustering around a Matilda...only to run like mad when they hear that siren, desperate to get away from the doomed vehicle.

Anyways, I don't see why Allies should have some mobile AA. That one map (I cannot remember its name right now for the life of me) starts out well enough for the Allies, but as soon as their Typhoons start encountering FW190s AND the four-barrelled monster that is the Wirbelwind..

Offline [130.Pz]S.Tiemann

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 489
  • FH-Betatester
    • View Profile
Re: M45 Quad mount
« Reply #26 on: 01-10-2009, 18:10:28 »
m19 twin bofors. nuff said

Offline verg_6

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 122
  • Crusader MkIII for life (Until 2.2, that is)
    • View Profile
Re: M45 Quad mount
« Reply #27 on: 01-10-2009, 18:10:51 »
m19 twin bofors. nuff said

Ah. the forerunner of the good ol 'Duster'...

Offline THeTA0123

  • The north remembers
  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 16.840
    • View Profile
Re: M45 Quad mount
« Reply #28 on: 01-10-2009, 19:10:59 »
m19 twin bofors. nuff said

Ah. the forerunner of the good ol 'Duster'...
Aaah the Duster. THE most hated thing by the NVA.

Anyway, the M19 was based on the M24 Chaffee, wich saw combat late 1944.So not for normandy

The best choise is the M3 Halftrack, with the Quad .50 M45 Maxson mount.It was fairly common
-i am fairly sure that if they took porn off the internet, there would only be one website left and it would be called bring back the porn "Perry cox, Scrubs.

Offline bakehouse

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 113
    • View Profile
Re: M45 Quad mount
« Reply #29 on: 02-10-2009, 04:10:10 »
yeah can we plzz get some mobile aa for the allied side it would give us a chance against the fw190's ,


oh, on a side note: why doesn't the wirbleiwind have much explosive radius i shot a typhoon with about 10 rounds direct nose and it didnt die but.............it wqas probly my ping of 300 that did it
:) WAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.............its hell>>>>>>>>deal with it :)