Author Topic: Battlefield "1"  (Read 9381 times)

Offline Alubat

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 550
    • View Profile
Re: Battlefield "1"
« Reply #120 on: 03-08-2016, 16:08:53 »
Battlefield 1 Funny Moments - Mythbusting & Martial Arts!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5013F1iwS4g

One to Watch .-)

Offline Alakazou

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1.367
  • FHer from the beginning
    • View Profile
Re: Battlefield "1"
« Reply #121 on: 15-08-2016, 18:08:50 »

Offline Roughbeak

  • Science of Hooting, PhD
  • Developer
  • ******
  • Posts: 1.435
    • View Profile
Re: Battlefield "1"
« Reply #122 on: 31-08-2016, 14:08:08 »

Offline Chad1992

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 502
  • Back in the Swing of Things
    • View Profile
Re: Battlefield "1"
« Reply #123 on: 11-09-2016, 03:09:01 »
It looks cool and has nice features.  But its just another run and gun.


Offline Torenico

  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 5.581
  • ¡Viva la Revolución!
    • View Profile
Re: Battlefield "1"
« Reply #124 on: 20-09-2016, 00:09:06 »
Ahh you're so dead Battlefield.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gw9KcqQSRRI



Offline MaJ.P.Bouras

  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 3.210
  • A Hellenic version of Jackie Chan.
    • View Profile
Re: Battlefield "1"
« Reply #125 on: 20-09-2016, 23:09:47 »
Wouldn't be BF game if it didn't have funny glitches and bugs.

Offline VonMudra

  • FH-Betatester
  • ***
  • Posts: 8.215
  • Traction Wars Developer- Research Dept
    • View Profile
Re: Battlefield "1"
« Reply #126 on: 21-09-2016, 02:09:38 »
Sadly, many of the things I find hilarious about the game aren't bugs or glitches at all.

They're the actual components and design of the game.


Offline Torenico

  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 5.581
  • ¡Viva la Revolución!
    • View Profile
Re: Battlefield "1"
« Reply #128 on: 25-10-2016, 06:10:17 »
What the...

I was watching TotalBiscuit review on this game's Singleplayer Campaign. Go to hell, seriously, rot in hell Battlefield.

Supersoldier shit?. Battlefield, please. Remember when you used to be a serious game in the past?. Yeah, the Japanese did not used StG-44s nor the Allies had M10 Wolverines in El Alamein, among other historical innacuracies, but at least it tried to be a serious game, it had that WW2 feeling, it was fun, no Fallout-like Power Armors, no super soldier taking out waves of enemies with a machinegun in WW1...

This monumental piece of crap only tries to be a Call of Duty but with some "WW1 feeling", they missed WW1 completely, these days BFs are made to compete with CoD and nothing else. They insulted WW1, they pretend to be serious but they're just laughing at WW1, being totally unrealistic on so many levels.


You're so dead, Battlefield. You had a point one day, 1942 got us into WW2, made it interesting with the limited tools and resources we had back then, Vietnam brought attention to a War that is somewhat forgotten, BF2 brought us this fantastic game set in modern times, 2142 brought us the last true Battlefield, an experiment that went very well for DICE..., after that it was just trying to remain competitive in the market against Call of Duty.., releasing new titles became a sport, dragged into that by their Nemesis, Battlefield became an Annual game, like the other piece of crap.


1942-2142, rest in peace. I'll remain true to the original series.
« Last Edit: 25-10-2016, 06:10:23 by Torenico »


Offline Alubat

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 550
    • View Profile
Re: Battlefield "1"
« Reply #129 on: 25-10-2016, 16:10:22 »
I Like the single player a lot. Still have 4 maps left.
Not enough maps, but maybe more will come in the future.
Battlefield 1 is an awesome action game just like Wolfenstein. I see no point of hating it.
 


Offline Torenico

  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 5.581
  • ¡Viva la Revolución!
    • View Profile
Re: Battlefield "1"
« Reply #130 on: 25-10-2016, 22:10:09 »
I Like the single player a lot. Still have 4 maps left.
Not enough maps, but maybe more will come in the future.
Battlefield 1 is an awesome action game just like Wolfenstein. I see no point of hating it.
 

It's not about hating, it's about staying true to the series. Battlefield always made you feel part of a big battle, you were just "one more soldier". Remember the 1942 campaign, of course it had no cutscenes nor main characters, it was just their maps arranged in historical order..., and that was it. To me, it was a great gamemode, trying to win every single map with a "Total Victory" (or something) as Axis was challenging, because you had no steel armor and a heavy machinegun to take down entire divisions of enemies..., despite being "the special one", you had no unlocks, no BS guns or nothing, you were literally on the same level as the bots.

BF1 campaign is all about yourself, as always, you win the entire war on your own, pretty much. That's no Battlefield...

"Matteo and the entire Italian Offensive was in danger as long as that artillery gun remained. So I had to take it down", that's so Call of Duty, Ramirez...


Offline Matthew_Baker

  • FH-Betatester
  • ***
  • Posts: 1.546
    • View Profile
Re: Battlefield "1"
« Reply #131 on: 26-10-2016, 01:10:19 »
Yea, can't agree. Battlefield Single Player has always been crap. It's always an after thought to the core multiplayer game.

This Battlefield Single player (from what I've seen) is the best BF Single Player ever. Sure they stole most of the 'get to cover/ kill all enemy's/ advance' from from Call of Duty and it's still an after thought, but it at least has better cut scenes ;D

Offline THeTA0123

  • The north remembers
  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 16.837
    • View Profile
Re: Battlefield "1"
« Reply #132 on: 26-10-2016, 16:10:18 »
battlefield 1 is a huge leap forward compared to the modern AAA shooters. But it STILL is a Triple AAA shooter. And appearntly it has to be one to be succesfull, wich is bullcrap

I really love the tonnes of WW1 era weapons in it. Even the many experimental ones. But some things blatently copied from AAA shooters is just..wrong

Lets look for example at the classes= Assault, medic, support, scout. HURRAY the same bogged down crap as we saw in the previous games...Now very weirdly placed in a WW1 shooter?
I am a simple man. When i think about WW1, i think about trench warfare and bolt action rifles with bayonets, watercooled MG's & such.

Can we make this properly work in a massive consumer game? not as much.

But we have tonnes of weapons in this game but..ONLY 4 bolt action rifles? seriously?
We have the Mauser G98, SMLE, Springfield & Steyr mannlicher M1895.
And things become in a way cool here. As DICE gives you the first time ever a modern game= THE steyr mannlicher. A cool design IRL, and many people are now "Wow? a straight pull rifle?i did not knew this exist! amazing!" And they even give you the correct rifle & Stutzen variants! Awesome!

But scopes on every fucking weapon? short to mid range scopes? sights? Seriously?

I just want a bolt action rifle with a bayonet. Thats all. But if you play on multiplayer...well you are in a huge disadvantage because everyone has these fucking scopes, running around and gunning around like madmen...

Atleast give a historical mode?

In ways this is a leap forward but in ways they jump right back at where they started..
-i am fairly sure that if they took porn off the internet, there would only be one website left and it would be called bring back the porn "Perry cox, Scrubs.

Offline Alubat

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 550
    • View Profile
Re: Battlefield "1"
« Reply #133 on: 26-10-2016, 16:10:16 »
Agree.
Singleplayer is maybe in a console gamer favor and not in a pc gamer bf1942 style of way. But its still much fun
In bf singleplayer you can wrench/repair plane while flying  ;D
In fh2 many players can repair tank on top of it while tank is driving & shooting around in the battlefield.
You can wear a helmet and still you die when crashing that bicycle. But its just a fun part of the game :-)
 

Offline Captain Pyjama Shark

  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 5.273
  • Captain of the Gravy Train
    • View Profile
Re: Battlefield "1"
« Reply #134 on: 26-10-2016, 16:10:35 »
I think the real mistake is thinking that a game has to be similar to a modern shooter to be fun, like Theta said.  I see that argument a lot about battlefield 1.