Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Beaufort

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 27
Gaming / Re: Battlefield 3
« on: 17-10-2011, 18:10:59 »
Now THAT is cool.

Gaming / Re: Battlefield 3
« on: 17-10-2011, 17:10:40 »
Do you realy have to support every single thing about this game Natty ? You would be much more believable if you weren't. How can spawning on everyone can create any tactic ? You kill 5 guys but it was pointless because they are going to spawn on the sixth anyway. Get out of here.
It keeps people playing together. Size of squads is reduced which makes it easier to eliminate an entire squad and also fixes the stupid SQL switching that occurred in BF2. Not a single player from the squad will have to sacrifice their enjoyment to function as a spawn point by lying somewhere in a bush. It worked pretty well in the beta, even with random joe's.

Yeah squad leader lying in a bush ... Cliché much ? A squad leader HAS to be on the move with its squad or he gets busted when his teammates spawn. Well, at least in FH2. ::)

Gaming / Re: Battlefield 3
« on: 17-10-2011, 16:10:55 »
I dont "support" anything.. Im saying what I think. Not like I care what you "believe" either.

Pff great, and I dont care what you care about either. /flame

Spawning on all the squad members create alot of interesting tactics and game play moments, you will understand later on in case you don't already. Or if you ever played BC2 in hardcore servers with tight clan-like play, you'd know how hard and serious the guys fight to eliminate the entire squad, since as you say "they are going to spawn on the last" unless the entire squad is dead. It also makes military styled "advance + cover" movements possible even in insanely "hot" areas (with lots of deaths / killls)

Maybe it is too hardcore for you, and you prefer to have only one little spawn-gnome squatting in a bush that you can run around looking for? Get out of here you too.

Right, Ill understand AFTER I pay for the game of course. Yes I have played BC2 vietnam with this feature and it was nothing more than a run and gun shooter with NO tactic. And you prefer running after six guys than one ? How's that ?

Gaming / Re: Battlefield 3
« on: 17-10-2011, 16:10:23 »
Do you realy have to support every single thing about this game Natty ? You would be much more believable if you weren't. How can spawning on everyone can create any tactic ? You kill 5 guys but it was pointless because they are going to spawn on the sixth anyway. Get out of here.

Modding / Re: French Hope
« on: 17-10-2011, 14:10:01 »
It is too big because there are no terrain forms forcing people to choose one route or another. There are no natural bottlenecks no place to form a front line with so few players. Too much space for flanking makes it too hard to defend.

... in your opinion ;). I find it a very nice change, although I also like straight forward maps such as Hurtgen...

Push system is not enough - would be nic to see such big map or even bigger (I hope to see such on eastern front) but it needs to be better designed. This kind of map with such amount of vehicles would be awesome but with about 200-300 players minimum.

Do you mean bigger maps than OD would need 200-300 players or OD itself ? Sure, I admit for 64 you would have to close a road or even make some flags impossible to recap as in PHL, but 128 is really enough for this layout.

Modding / Re: French Hope
« on: 17-10-2011, 12:10:11 »
La Varde and Sedan need new buildings (Sedan much more) but the design is cool on both.

Operation Dynamo = best FH2 map ever.

I don't see how this is too big since it has only three flags at a time (SoT much ?) and tons of planes which obviously need plenty of space.

General Discussion / Re: Post your FH2 Screenshots
« on: 15-10-2011, 00:10:41 »

you are doing it wrong.

Suggestions / Re: Lower recoil in smg's and pistols
« on: 14-10-2011, 17:10:04 »
A chance to transform yet another thread into "BRING BACK THE 2.0 SUPPRESSION"? Count me in!

Srsly, who are these mysterious individuals who wanted to tone down the suppression? Whenever I see someone posting about it here, everyone is wanting the old suppression back.

 :-X That's a goddamn lie !

Now back on topic, thx.

Gaming / Re: Battlefield 3
« on: 14-10-2011, 16:10:19 »
Over half of the FH2 maps have their flags closer to each other than those on Caspian Border. Get over it already. I bet you didn't even try it.

Some maps, mostly the infantry maps. And the big gigantic vehicle/infantry maps have proper flag placement and distance. Saw the new pics of the new BF3 maps? Same tight circle flag placement.
You probably refer to all these super popular 2.0 desert maps ;)

Yeah, the ones that rock with 128 players ... :P

Gaming / Re: Battlefield 3
« on: 14-10-2011, 13:10:10 »
@Beaufort: We can make this in to a theory of fun discussion if you want, but it will probably get too complex for some, and instead turn ugly. Let me end it with; you also want, only FUN. That is your goal when you press the power-button on the PC, log in to windows, and then log on to a game. How that FUN materializes for you, can differ ofcourse, but there is no other goal here, no other desire than to be entertained. All games entertain (provide fun) in different ways, be it TF2, ArmA, BF3, FH2 or MineCraft, all delivers an experience, and if we like the game, we have "fun" playing it. Period, The end.

By "fun" I meant "having a laugh"...  :P

Kelmola had good points, the features we'd like for BF3 that you find lame ("modtools-serverbrowser-dedicatedservers-bigopenmaps" + no difference between players) are the one that makes FH2 great. Either they aren't lame, or you have to start a new mod somewhere ...

Gaming / Re: Battlefield 3
« on: 14-10-2011, 11:10:15 »
Yeah Natty why don't you make a mini WWII mod for team fortress or something if its only FUN you are looking for, seriously ?  :-\

General / Re: Tank turrets
« on: 06-10-2011, 14:10:40 »
The new turret must be pretty hard on noobs and sometimes they use the mouse anyway, which makes tanks look even more unrealistic... Wouldn't it be simpler to add something like cod 2 tanking with a delay on the turret ?


General Discussion / Re: FH2 Propaganda Videos - Help Needed
« on: 04-10-2011, 18:10:31 »
Wait ... You are not even going to make the video ? Lol, so djinnish... Do people actually feed you with spoons where you live ?

Gaming / Re: Battlefield 3
« on: 01-10-2011, 23:10:51 »
bla bla bla
Yustax, you are a known BF3 forum troll, you're only making yourself look more lame now.. anyone can just go to the BF3 forum and read your posts... aaaalways the saaaame oooold boooring rants about dice and ea and how they dont do all the things you want... really, doesnt it get old for you too? Before you sit down and write your 103rd anti-dice post, dont you like.. think, at least a little bit "why am I doing all this?"  :D

You're reading hundreds of threads.. yea, made by the same 20-30 dudes... you all have a very nice little group of back-padding trolls, high-fiving eachother and giving eachother broners by spamming remarks or point out bad things with Ea's games or services.

For what worth? People buy and enjoy the games anyway. less than 1% of players even bother with forums.. no one hear you  ;)

Lol ... Still saying you are not insulting anyone Natty ? :P

Gaming / Re: Battlefield 3
« on: 01-10-2011, 14:10:09 »
Yes i have.

* Steam doesn’t link the software/hardware survey results to the Steam account.

* Steam doesn’t check the software/hardware survey results at each boot or at anytime (exception : if you’re randomly picked again). It is a complete hoax.

* Steam doesn’t sell the software/hardware survey results to third parties.

* Steam software/hardware survey results are displayed publicly, available to anyone at this page :

... and btw I dont like steam either.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 27