Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Sander93

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 52
1
Gaming / Re: World of Tanks
« on: 19-06-2013, 21:06:03 »


Cookies for the first one to spot what's so special about this picture.

2
Off-Topic / Re: Picture of the Day (Other eras)
« on: 18-06-2013, 19:06:32 »
They seem quite the miserable bunch. And the one on the left looks like a doll. Lol.

3
Gaming / Re: War Thunder
« on: 16-06-2013, 16:06:40 »
The answer to everything is the Bf 109 G6.


Nothing survives a burst of those 3 30mm autocannons.

4
Off-Topic / Re: Picture of the Day (Other eras)
« on: 15-06-2013, 13:06:59 »

I love how big and awesome that thing looks while it still has that cute little windscreen for the commander.  ;D

5
Off-Topic / Re: Picture of the Day
« on: 15-06-2013, 13:06:52 »


That's so cool. But how on earth are they going to get the bottom one out again?

6
Gaming / Re: Total War games
« on: 14-06-2013, 14:06:31 »
I don't even know what that thing that exploded was supposed to be, but it definitely took out an entire cohort with a single-blast.

Probably an explosive pot launched by a ballista, but it did not take out the entire cohort. It's the same as in the latest total wars; half the unit gets thrown onto the ground by the force of the explosion but very few actually die. You can see that most of the men falling down still have a soldier triangle, which means they're not dead yet and that they'll get back up on their feet again.

You can see them running back to their unit in the next shot.

7
Off-Topic / Re: Picture of the Day (Other eras)
« on: 12-06-2013, 18:06:22 »
The side skirts are indeed boxes of reactive armor, but I meant those two boxes with antennas at the front of both sides. I think I've seen simular devices before on the hoods of humvees, and those were IED jammers.

There seem to be rather a lot of antennas for the sole purpose of communication as well.

8
Off-Topic / Re: Picture of the Day
« on: 12-06-2013, 15:06:19 »
Ha! Why use the MG shield when you can just fire over it, right?

9
Off-Topic / Re: Picture of the Day (Other eras)
« on: 11-06-2013, 14:06:15 »
Piper of the Royal Scots Dragoon Guards "Scots Greys" in front of a maneuvering Challenger II.


What are all those antennas for?
Boxes on the sides up front are IED jammers?


Here's another picture of such a heavily modified Challenger II.

10
Off-Topic / Re: Picture of the Day (Other eras)
« on: 09-06-2013, 12:06:31 »
What's the chopper squashed away inside? Sea Hawk?

11
Off-Topic / Re: Picture of the Day
« on: 09-06-2013, 12:06:04 »
maybe it was hit after it was knocked out by a bazooka?

It's just a set propaganda picture because a soldier up close with a bazooka is way cooler than a tank shooting from a kilometer away. The position the cameraman is in gives away that he's either completely nuts, or in already secured territory. He would be behind the soldier otherwise.

12
Gaming / Re: World of Tanks
« on: 09-06-2013, 07:06:04 »
I just hope the arty tweaks don't affect my obj 212 too much :/

Ha. Hahaha. Hahahaha.



Sell it.

13
Off-Topic / Re: Questions about tanks
« on: 09-06-2013, 07:06:44 »
Israelis used a bunch of different Shermans as well, although they upgraded most of them.

14
Gaming / Re: Total War games
« on: 08-06-2013, 17:06:37 »
I definitely need a new CPU for this game...

Minimum and recommended specs have been officially confirmed to be pretty much the same as Shogun 2's.

15
Gaming / Re: Dear mother of god... CoH2 confirmed!
« on: 08-06-2013, 17:06:41 »
Yup, same here. I've been waiting for this game for years and to be honest it's quite a big disappointment.

It's not a bad game, but expectations were higher and it could have been so much better. IMO they wasted way too much time on adding stupid features (annoying blizzards, ranking/leveling system, snow/cold, etc) instead of making a really good game. Company of Heroes would have been such a great basis. All they needed to do IMO was improve the graphics, add more units and maps and polish the combat system.

Instead, they made what seems to be quite a pathetic (seen from gameplay standards) modification and decided to name it a full game.


It's not intense, it's not tactical. The camera is annoyingly close to the battlefield and combat seems very passive (two squads shooting at eachother somehow just looks dull, compared to CoH where you were watching the bullets fly and ricochet everywhere). There are tons of mechanics that don't really add anything but annoyance, and even worse slow down the pace of the gameplay.

There is barely any unit diversity, and above all the armies are boringly identical. Like pointed out above, there seems to be a lack of a proper 'mid-game'. You start the game and have a few good infantry fights, untill you deploy MGs and bunkers. Next thing you know it's the battle of Kursk all over again.

It's just... boring.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 52