When we had that in the beta, we had two kits added to mapdata.py (where the kitlimits are set). But there might be more to it than that.

Yeah, sorry I haven't made myself clear. My point was that allocation of sub-machine guns for Commonwealth units in MTO seems to be comperatively high. Sometimes you would see almost half of a squad having smg's.

But admittedly I could just stumbled upon some particular photos that clouded my perception of the way bigger picture. So maybe I'm wrong about that.

Commonwealth troops often had a pool of Stens or Thompsons at Battalion to issue on an ad hoc basis to patrols and recon mission.

I guess the Finns should also take the entire war effort as a distorted, fantastic hero tale - as Russian archives/documents are the most credible, unbiased source on the topic.

Nobody is saying that. Can you even read?

Generally loss reports are more credible than kill counts, which are often enflated and hard to track during combat. There is also an incentive in internal reports to inflate enemy losses, but not reporting your own lost vehicles is rather foolish, since that means not receiving replacements or being assigned missions above your strength. So in historical science you ususally check kill claims by looking at the opposing sides losses for the day. In the past this was rather hard to achieve for the Soviet side, but after the opening of Russian archives it has become easier and shown that German kill claims for the Eastern Front were (as for all sides) greatly exaggerated.

Thanks for the feedback. The Soviet unit had actually more SVT40s than Mosin Nagants. Not as many smgs though, so those wont be unlimited as they usually are.

Makes no sense, if anything the rifleman should have the ammunition. The MG is there to shoot the ammunition, not carry extra rounds.

I think that is the Stalingrad Univermag.