Tragedy and gun violence

[Oddball]

And what if you have your own private range?

When you simply stop selling them to private persons then people will just run dry after a while.

Yes, because firearm and ammo manufacturers are going to lay off thousands of employees and lose millions in profit. Unlikely.

Already beat you to it years ago.....

OMG! Assualt Rifle, Ban it@! Lolz!

[Tuco]

An assault bolt action, love it.

[Zoologic]

Pardon me, are you guys doing that to troll gun-haters?

And of course, I don't want to spoil the fun 

[siben]

And what if you have your own private range?

When you simply stop selling them to private persons then people will just run dry after a while.

Yes, because firearm and ammo manufacturers are going to lay off thousands of employees and lose millions in profit. Unlikely.

So, because you cant shoot armour piercing bullets anymore you wil completely shot shooting? Interesting, I would have just started shooting regular ammunition then cousing a massive increase of those sales.

And what are you even on about, all that special ammunition is mostly cheap surplus, so you care about those middle east and russian/chinese workers that much?

[Chadoi]

Yes, because firearm and ammo manufacturers are going to lay off thousands of employees and lose millions in profit. Unlikely.

The almighty dollar winning out again.

[Slayer]

Yes, because firearm and ammo manufacturers are going to lay off thousands of employees and lose millions in profit. Unlikely.

The almighty dollar winning out again.

Yes, because making money is more important than to make society safer.

[THeTA0123]

But are you willing to ruin tens of thousands there lives for an "Safer" society? You can guarantee that these people will have misery finding a new job in these terrible economic times. But you cannot guarantee that it will actually make society safer

Stop watching everything trough pink glasses. BAN GUNS WORLD GOES SAFER
It simply does-NOT-work-like-that

[Slayer]

But are you willing to ruin tens of thousands there lives for an "Safer" society?

So, it is better to LOSE tens of thousands of lives?

[Pascucci the Whiner]

But are you willing to ruin tens of thousands there lives for an "Safer" society?

So, it is better to LOSE tens of thousands of lives?

According to alcohol drinkers, yes.

[THeTA0123]

But are you willing to ruin tens of thousands there lives for an "Safer" society?

So, it is better to LOSE tens of thousands of lives?

What you say makes no sense

Fact=Many will loose there lives
CLAIMED=Less people will die with guns banned!

Since 2000 they made WW2 bolt action rifles free to buy in my country. Yet not a single person was killed by these weapons. We are talking about hundreds of thousands of these rifles....

Gun crime has been dropping drasticly and even more so in the past few years.

[Slayer]

But are you willing to ruin tens of thousands there lives for an "Safer" society?

So, it is better to LOSE tens of thousands of lives?

According to alcohol drinkers, yes.

You write like you are one yourself 

What you say makes no sense

Fact=Many will loose there lives
CLAIMED=Less people will die with guns banned!

Since 2000 they made WW2 bolt action rifles free to buy in my country. Yet not a single person was killed by these weapons. We are talking about hundreds of thousands of these rifles....

Gun crime has been dropping drasticly and even more so in the past few years.

Just because you disagree with me, doesn't mean that what I say makes no sense.

However, your Fact/CLAIMED thingy does sound nonsensical. What do you mean by "many will lose their lives"?

Your bolt action story is nice, but we are talking of "guns" in general, not just bolt action rifles. I thought it was clear that the pro/anti gun argument was not about hoibbying collectors storing their WW2 era rifles in a closet. Apparently not (you can read back in the thread, please do so before we keep repeating ourselves ad infinitum).

[[130.Pz]S.Lainer]

I thought it was clear that the pro/anti gun argument was not about hoibbying collectors storing their WW2 era rifles in a closet.

Well how about updating us on what the argument is about then?

[Slayer]

I don't feed trolls, Lainer

[[130.Pz]S.Lainer]

I don't feed trolls, Lainer

It was a legit question...... 

[Oddball]

Yes, because firearm and ammo manufacturers are going to lay off thousands of employees and lose millions in profit. Unlikely.

The almighty dollar winning out again.

Yes, because making money is more important than to make society safer.

Yes, because Liberal business regulations and restrictions which have already placed many of our US businesses over-seas do not cause tough fiscal times? Poor economies (like we have now) spur a rise a crime sprees and violence in general. Like we have now.