Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Kelmola

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 191
31
Off-Topic / Re: About Last Night...
« on: 12-11-2016, 15:11:43 »
IMO the "winner takes all" rule is much more retarded than overweighing the votes from less populated states. But I wouldn't be so sure what way the results would change even if the "winner takes all" rule would be dropped. Now it's pointless to vote the other party if one has overwhelming majority anyway so these voters stay home. Eg. in California the amount of Republican voters could actually increase if their votes actually mattered.

And us Europeans shouldn't be too proud as long as we have the ridiculousness of our own in the election practices. For example in parliamentary elections many countries have the silly principle of "long lists", the Inner Party decides the preferred order of candidates and the proles and Outer Party get to only vote the list instead of individuals. Even more countries have the d'Hondt method, where you can vote for an individual but he or she gets the votes in proportion to the support of his/her party, so one candidate with 10 votes may get elected just by being in the right party whereas a candidate with 10 000 votes is not.

32
Off-Topic / Re: About Last Night...
« on: 11-11-2016, 00:11:26 »
I agree, Sanders would have been a much tougher opposition to Trump, and I would have preferred him over Hillary any day, unfortunately Clinton's friends in the DNC actively sabotaged Sanders's campaign from within. As reported by Wikileaks, not by Trump campaign, mind you. So much for fair primaries...

...and then Clinton, already the easiest political target in the US, fell to the oldest trick in the book: trolling. Trump "accidentally" lets out a gaffe, Hillary camp bites into it like rabid piranhas, and forgets to convey what was her agenda, if any. See, Sanders actually had clear ideas how issues should be solved. Clinton's version - as conveyed by the local media - soon devolved into "please tell us what you would like us to do". It's nice to listen to the people but at some point you have to take leadership if you want to be a leader. Values are great in a mission statement, but people who want change need concrete action plans.

The final mistake was when Hillary started targeting not Trump, but Trump's voters. Amidst all the muckraking, the infamous "deplorables" line was a new bottom low. It was as if swing voters did not exist and would suddenly feel guilty instead of enraged when being called names.

---

The social media outrage amazingly still continues unabated. It seems to have cyclic movement, people wind down in the evening and wake up relatively peaceful, but as the day rolls towards evening, they become more and more frenzied due to exposure to social media forming a feedback loop. And I'm becoming rather embarassed at the columns in the newspapers when the editor starts the nth tirade on how her entire world collapsed overnight and she realized that the universe is evil and how can she tell about this to her children (won't anyone think of the children?). Though I'd like to see even one US artist keeping his or her word of moving to Canada if Trump gets elected. Considering the massive flow of emigrants after similar threats in 2000 and 2004, I am not exactly holding my breath... ::)

What is surreal though is that (according to news, though of course they only pick the juiciest subjects) there are demonstrators on the streets demanding an assassination of Trump. It did not go this far even when W. was elected first with popular minority, not even when he was re-elected. Two wrongs make one right? Democracy is acceptable only if it gives favourable results?

---

If the election system constantly gives biased results, surely there would be at some point an initiative to change it? Even if the proportional method is kept, "winner takes all" is just stupid and practically guarantees a two-party system. I don't know the particulars, but has any US politician even tried to suggest a change? Silly me. Of course not, because politicians being politicians they think that next time they are going to use the system to win.

33
Off-Topic / Re: About Last Night...
« on: 10-11-2016, 00:11:09 »
So, in which thread are we actually supposed to discuss The Happening? This or RU?

---

The elector system probably stems from the fact that the US is a union of states (which in some cases have more authority than EU member states have nowadays), and the "underrepresented" regions are usually in such system given more weight in order to keep their opinion relevant and avoid groupthink. To compare, in the EU, if parliamentary seats were allocated directly proportional to the population, most of the smaller countries would have a fraction of the seats they have now. Can't see anyone wanting to repeal that, so why should the US?

---

Provoked by the endless moaning, I had actually written down some comments on why Trump won and why it's a good thing, but decided not to post that text (yet) because it's full of crimethink and I don't want to be sent to Miniluv for re-education.

But I will say, what was absolutely hilarious was the (social) media outcry this morning European time, which only escalated after Americans got back online in the evening our time, further fueling the hysteria this side of the pond. It was (and still is) as if a thermonuclear war was already on and there would be locusts, plague, and the Four Horsemen abound, and a new sequel to the Twilight franchise had been announced. This is even more delicious than when W. got elected.

34
Gaming / Re: Pokémon GO
« on: 24-08-2016, 00:08:38 »
If one lives close by a shore, Magikarps are aplenty (and since every Magikarp nest also has a chance of spawning a Dratini every now and then, well, do the math). Haven't bothered yet to make a dedicate "fishing trip" (WINTER IS COMING so maybe I should while I still can), but for example around the local ferry terminal there's about 10 (or more) water-type spawns within about 100m of each other (noticed this while visiting the electronics store across the street from the terminal), many of which yield Karps.

But yeah, rural areas are screwed doubly. Not only do they not have any pokéstops, but pokémon spawn frequency is based on the amount of mobile users nearby: more exactly, based on the big data statistics Niantic pulled in 2012-3 when they were still part of Google and were planning their previous game Ingress, from which the stops/gyms are recycled (yes, they are user-added but originally to Ingress, Niantic is not accepting any new submissions for the time being because they are hard pressed to even respond to customer service requests). However, since everything is based on 3-4 years old data, anyone living in a district newer than that will find the amount of monsters quite lacking...

However, there's a nifty trick rural users can use. First, check that "Sightings" is empty and there are no 'mons or even spawns nearby (previously, these were the "someone's digging the grass" animations, nowadays one can use Ingress for the same, as exotic matter (XM) concentrations function as Pokémon spawn points). Then, pop Incense, or if a stop is nearby (and there are no Sightings or XM nearby), place a lure in there (or both). According to teh intarwebz, you should be rewarded by an influx of rare 'mons.

Just made it to level 22 btw. And fortunately Niantic folded and reverted the speed limit to 21 kph / 350m/min, so maybe I'll keep on being addicted.

35
Gaming / Re: Pokémon GO
« on: 20-08-2016, 11:08:13 »
...and Niantic dropped the speed limit to 10,5 km/h from 18 km/h, effectively forcing people to walk and not run when hatching. DROPPED

36
Gaming / Pokémon GO
« on: 16-08-2016, 00:08:04 »
So, why aren't you on Level 20+ yet? :P

It's obviously an "early access pre-alpha" despite reputedly having been in a public beta already, but the 0.3.x version number seems to be accurate. Practically none of the features advertised in the announcement trailer exist (PvP battles on the go, genuine team vs. team battles, "raids" and/or events, and most importantly, trading pokémons) and even a supposedly working pokémon tracking system is still in "beta testing for selected users", which would still be a much more vague system than the trailer suggests. Oh well, the launch trailer did away with all this, but it still has the bluetooth alert gizmo, and suggests that the odometer would work if the screen is turned on and/or lock screen is used (hint: it won't, the game loses the GPS signal due to how Android is made). And the launch trailer encourages cheating (not to mention potentially suicidal behaviour) because people are playing the game while riding a bicycle.

Despite the real game missing from this, it has actually managed to become a breakthrough in "gamifying" physical exercise, which I think is a good justification all by itself. Across the first world and increasingly in developing countries, sedentary lifestyle with too little of physical activity is contributing to various health problems, so anything that gets people (like me) moving is a good thing basically. Last night what was supposed to be a quick "incense run" of 30 mins (because Incense spawns a new 'mon every 200 metres moved) accidentally stretched out to 2 hours of interval training.

Also, it's funny how nowadays more and more people are clearly playing it whenever they are walking. Parks and squares are filling up with people who talk and get acquainted with each other, and of course NIMBY's are at it and are raving how public spaces should be empty and silent at all times. Oh well, at least now also in beergardens and on terraces people have a common ice-breaker to open the discussion.

Though, Niantic really should build a game in there somewhere to keep the users interested. And of course, WINTER IS COMING and since the game eats battery like no tomorrow, cold air is not going to increase playing time, not to mention that throwing pokéballs with gloves on will be impossible. Interesting to see whether the game survives until spring thaws outside the regions where snowfall is a national emergency that fortunately lasts only a day or two.

PS. Can't even blame the nostalgy, I was too old for Pokémon when it became all the rage so all this is new to me except for the "wild x appeared" and "x uses y, it is super effective!" memes.

37
Off-Topic / Re: DC cinematic universe
« on: 01-08-2016, 00:08:40 »
It's not just Hollywood, mind you - Good German turning against the Bad Germans is a long-running trope in the Commando comics (Korkeajännitys for us Finns).

Not that any of those would make good a movie either.

38
Off-Topic / Re: Revolting Uniting
« on: 23-07-2016, 00:07:17 »
So Erdo has denounced the European Convention of Human Rights, has arrested everyone in public office even suspected of not following the Party line, and using the supposedly constitutional (it are because I says so) state of emergency has given himself both executive and legislative powers. I think it's safe to say that he loves democracy just as sincerely as Senator Palpatine.

39
Off-Topic / Re: Revolting Uniting
« on: 17-07-2016, 16:07:09 »
So the conclusion (even in the media) seems to be that this was Night of the Long Knives 2.0: Turkish Boogaloo?

40
Off-Topic / Re: Revolting Uniting
« on: 16-07-2016, 16:07:09 »
Really? Military coups rarely work out well. Say what you want about Erdogan, but he is democratically elected, so removing him by force sends the wrong message entirely.
Hitler was democratically elected too, so removing him by force sent the wrong message entirely?

We're talking about a guy who has never even bothered to pretend that his goal would be anything else than an Iran-style Islamistic theocracy. "Democracy is like a tram, you have to get off at the right stop", and all that. Yes, him losing in a fair election would be preferable to a coup, but getting a fair election in Turkey is a distant hope, so a coup is the next best thing. Maybe theocracy indeed is what the majority of Turkish people wants, but at some point the minority has to be protected from the majority, and Erdogan or AKP are not going to do that if they get more power.

41
Off-Topic / Re: Revolting Uniting
« on: 16-07-2016, 16:07:57 »
What if this was a false flag operation by Erdogan and his cronies to justify even more civil rights violations and make the laws even more theocratic?

42
Off-Topic / Re: Revolting Uniting
« on: 16-07-2016, 12:07:03 »
A pity.

43
Off-Topic / Re: Revolting Uniting
« on: 16-07-2016, 09:07:07 »
Good riddance Erdogan, you won't be missed.

44
General Discussion / Re: The Newcomer FAQ
« on: 15-07-2016, 08:07:14 »
Could you perhaps add in the first post a line "The development team has no plans or intentions of making FH2 a standalone game or changing the engine for making FH3 for the foreseeable future"? ;)

45
Off-Topic / Re: Game of Thrones
« on: 29-06-2016, 01:06:40 »
>expecting a paranoid alcoholic to make rational decisions
Even though it's actually toned down in the show, it has been apparent for the best part of three seasons now that Cersei and her sanity are parting ways at an accelerating pace, which is not helped at all by her ever-increasing wine binges. She was an amoral plotter and heavy drinker already before, but Joffrey's death was the breaking point - she basically lost it and sees enemies everywhere and gives zero fraks because she's psychotically obsessed by "Maggy's" (12-year old's translitteration of "maegi") prophecy (the death of all her children, the younger and more beautiful queen displacing her, and the valonqar strangling her to death, latter being omitted from the show) and tries to desperately prevent it (yet is half-resigned to the idea of the prophecy being unavoidable), and soothes her suffering with more wine.

In the books, this is even more pronounced, she goes full-on Stalin and basically whenever she feels someone is not supporting her enthusiastically enough she tries to have him/her killed, often relying on overly complex plots whose success rate is about the same as those of one Wile E. Coyote. It's not like arming a violent cult just to curtail the influence her daughter-in-law has on her son is an idea that could go wrong in any way...

The irony is of course that it is her own actions to prevent the prophecy that fulfill the prophecy: she never said "no" to Joffrey which led to his assassination (since Olenna understandably wants to protect her granddaughter from the Westerosi Psycho Jr.), she starts meddling with Dorne that probably will lead even in the books in Myrcella's death, and when trying to destroy the cult she raised, she blew up Tommen's wife, mentor, in-laws, uncle, and at this point, Tommen may not even know that she was not in the Sept and he always was the too sensitive one, so what did she expect really. Also, by killing and betraying left and right, she's created so many angry younger siblings (which valonqar translates to) that practically anyone (besides first-born) could fulfill the prophecy of the valonqar at this point (she's herself still convinced it's her valonqar and it's Tyrion, not Jaime who is also her little brother).

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 191