Where's Hiter? His military decisions screwed up alot.

This. Good thing he was in command, almost every major battle the Germans lost was because of him.
(Splitting forces at Stalinrad, ordering big tank assault at Kursk to wait for new tanks so the Russians could dig in properly, prioritizing the wrong supplylines, etc etc)

And ofcourse declaring war to pretty much every big nation in the world at the same time.

I endorse this event or product.
Same for cannons and perhaps artillery.

Can't we use the numpad keys instead?

Here's mine,

like to keep it clean. Thus I prefer to use Steam to run all programs instead of using desktop icons.

http://www.whoisthemonkey.com/videos/31f15-flying-with-1-wing

This thing amazes me! Now thats strong structure

You'll be amazed what an A10 can withstand. Since it's a lowflying, slow, ground attack airplane it is likely to get hit by smallarms. So they made sure in their design that it can still fly home with (parts of) the wing missing, only one of two engines, one of two tails, landing gear damaged and hydraulic systems damaged.

MoW - No Skirmish Mode = COH > MoW.

About that, one very big advantage of this game over CoH is that this infantry can actually use tanks for cover. One of the few major downsides of CoH has always been that there seemed to be no harmony between tanks and infantry. It's all about cover, yet infantry cant use tanks for it. Tanks also drive way faster than infantry can run. It was always more like having infantry move in front as targetpractice for the enemy so your tanks could move in unharmed and begin their rape. If there was one thing I could change it was the gameplay for infantry and tank combos which should include the above aswell as perhaps bonusses, like less damage taken for the infantry and larger sight radius for tanks.

Very well, I only read the last page starting with your post so I didn't know the context.
*slaps himself in the face and goes to read the first pages*

but to label all resistance fighters as terrorists merely because they were defending their right to democracy against Nazi aggressors is ludicrous and disrespectful in the least.

You're doing exactly the same thing.

Nazis gave no concern about the human rights of those they occupied so they should expect none in return. In the fight against Facism, as far as I'm concerned, anything is justified. Anything.

I can't disagree that he indeed generalizes the resistance fighters, but you're doing the same thing with Germans. So bombing the hell out of millions of innocent Germans is okay because it's all for the greater good? Not all Germans were bloodthursty Nazis. The NSDAP never achieved more than 37% of the votes during fair elections. And of those 37%, a lot is just people under the influence of Nazi propaganda. You'' ll have to understand that they lived in an environment without Wikipedia, good ejucation or freedom of speech / news. They only knew what they were told and thought Hitler and his party would make Germany proud again. Bombing German cities should have also been convited as warcrimes. But I guess that's just the advantage of winning. Same goes for Stalin who murdered over three times as many people as Hitler did. And that is just the 'most positive' of estimates.

Nope, with AT rounds; I always got the red ''hit''-indicator.