Forgotten Hope Public Forum
Announcements => Announcements => Topic started by: Eat Uranium on 01-09-2019, 12:09:15
-
1800UTC for the next render.
Duck Hunt
http://forgottenhope.warumdarum.de (http://forgottenhope.warumdarum.de/news.php?id_news=538)
-
OH YEAH, looking forward to the news ;D
-
Trench gun? Remington Model 11?
Nice minimalistic Sotka :o
The six-spoke wheels are kinda post-war thing (on Finnish T-34 m1941s, anyway), but otherwise really great job!
-
Great skin
-
Love doing Finnish armor camo and markings. Always interesting to see that in a game.
-
Niceee.. Finns are getting more and more toys!!!
And, Finns t34s and ISU were not painted in camo by pictures I saw.. any proof?
Or was it done to make difference gameplay reasons?
-
And, Finns t34s and ISU were not painted in camo by pictures I saw.. any proof?
Or was it done to make difference gameplay reasons?
Wut? they are painted after exact vehicles that took part in the battle of.... Btw, this is typical Finnish camo patern of the era, as far as I know. What pictures did you see?
Proof (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pWYVgq15G14)
-
Niceee.. Finns are getting more and more toys!!!
And, Finns t34s and ISU were not painted in camo by pictures I saw.. any proof?
Or was it done to make difference gameplay reasons?
http://www.andreaslarka.net/ps231003/145407.jpg
https://www.jaegerplatoon.net/ISU152_2.jpg
-
I see Ivancic1941's point. The wartime camouflage on Sotkas (sans the test vehicles) was probably darker and the lighter patterns were applied more sparingly in thinner stripes.
(https://i.imgur.com/OUqdO4R.jpg)
(https://i.imgur.com/IK5XKDi.jpg)
(https://i.imgur.com/Eg7UuAU.jpg)
(https://i.imgur.com/xYTD5Iz.jpg)
When it comes to the museum pieces... well, even the good people at Parola have been laughing at some of their past 'cosmetic' restorations :)
-
I see Ivancic1941's point. The wartime camouflage on Sotkas (sans the test vehicles) was probably darker and the lighter patterns were applied more sparingly in thinner stripes.
Your point has literally nothing to do with what Ivancic said. He mentioned no camo.
-
Your point has literally nothing to do with what Ivancic said. He mentioned no camo.
Oh yeah. Well, that's different then.