1
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Sure. Not going to nitpick all your answers, but c'mon;QuoteStug III and others have only 2.5x magnification gun sights
Sfl.Z.F. 1a = 5x / 8 degrees
No need for links, I have a library worth of "few" thousands on the German and Allied armour - I can do some healthy comparisons based upon this. But you can always stick to your WoT/Warthunder, if the Soviet bias is not strong enough for you
An interesting topic. It's fairly difficult to consider all the balance factors and still, make the game historically pleasing for everyone.
When it comes to the sloping armour, it was quite easily penetrated by a piercing round with a ballistic cap (PzGr 39): it just didn't ricochet that easily off the sloped surface, especially if the angle was less than 60 degrees. Sure, T-34-85's frontal armour was increased - but, at the cost of the rear armour, as well as top and bottom. Also, the linking of the armour plates became much weaker and the turret's base (+ring) became more vulnerable to ricochets and small caliber rounds. And then there's the case of deterioration of the steel quality, which in the Soviet tanks hit lower than 250-280 Brinells, when in the American tanks it was pretty much standard 300-320 (and got better towards the end of the war, due to consistent quality control).
Personally, I'd find the 85 too accurate if I'd quote Robert Michulec's "T-34 Mythological Weapon": "the theoretical accuracy of the 85 mm gun was 63% at 1,500 meters", while Panther's 75 mm L/70 gun was almost 100% (theoretical) and 72% (actual) at the same distance."
So.. maybe 85 could have more punch, but please make it less accurate