Poll

Wich one do you like more?

Old
66 (79.5%)
New (current one)
17 (20.5%)

Total Members Voted: 82

Voting closed: 09-07-2010, 10:07:30

Author Topic: Plane Physics: Old or new?  (Read 9190 times)

Offline Limonero

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 112
    • View Profile
Re: Plane Physics: Old or new?
« Reply #30 on: 09-07-2010, 09:07:52 »
Soon the results will be revealed...
What will happen...?

Offline SiCaRiO

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1.554
    • View Profile
Re: Plane Physics: Old or new?
« Reply #31 on: 09-07-2010, 12:07:38 »
old physics ftw ^^

Offline Flippy Warbear

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 6.921
  • Adequately docile
    • View Profile
Re: Plane Physics: Old or new?
« Reply #32 on: 09-07-2010, 12:07:59 »
Soon the results will be revealed...
What will happen...?

Want me to spoil the results?  :P

Offline Strat_84

  • FH-Betatester
  • ***
  • Posts: 369
  • Lemming Chieftain
    • View Profile
Re: Plane Physics: Old or new?
« Reply #33 on: 09-07-2010, 12:07:07 »
Hhmmmm, the result is clear.

It reminds me the election score of a President in a Banana Republic. Except that nobody was corrupted to get it.  ;D


Offline Limonero

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 112
    • View Profile
Re: Plane Physics: Old or new?
« Reply #34 on: 09-07-2010, 12:07:12 »
Except that nobody was corrupted to get it.  ;D

Yeah... ::)

Offline Josh094

  • FH-Betatester
  • ***
  • Posts: 1.629
  • Oh dear.
    • View Profile
    • ProjectBarrett
Re: Plane Physics: Old or new?
« Reply #35 on: 09-07-2010, 22:07:48 »
And now hopefully these clear results will make a difference and we'll get good physics back. If they are doing it for their audience, this shows them what we want :D


Offline Ts4EVER

  • Banner of THeTA0123
  • Developer
  • ******
  • Posts: 7.812
    • View Profile
Re: Plane Physics: Old or new?
« Reply #36 on: 09-07-2010, 22:07:39 »
They should just throw out all planes, all they lead to is bitching at the airfield and annoying ground raping aa positions.  ;)

Offline Krätzer

  • Developer
  • ******
  • Posts: 621
  • Bitter Lemon
    • View Profile
Re: Plane Physics: Old or new?
« Reply #37 on: 09-07-2010, 22:07:52 »
The new ones match better the Gameplay of the Engine.

Offline Paavopesusieni

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1.401
  • Spongebob
    • View Profile
Re: Plane Physics: Old or new?
« Reply #38 on: 09-07-2010, 22:07:09 »
Definitely not, old ones matched much better as then 6 pounder wasn't AA.

Old was really good for BF2 physics.

Offline Krätzer

  • Developer
  • ******
  • Posts: 621
  • Bitter Lemon
    • View Profile
Re: Plane Physics: Old or new?
« Reply #39 on: 09-07-2010, 22:07:34 »
If you can´t see so far its shit to fly uber fast... thats my opinion as Gamer not as Dev.
« Last Edit: 09-07-2010, 22:07:41 by Krätzer »

Offline THeTA0123

  • The north remembers
  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 16.842
    • View Profile
Re: Plane Physics: Old or new?
« Reply #40 on: 09-07-2010, 23:07:33 »
Soon the results will be revealed...
What will happen...?
Clearly the outcome wassent never really in doubt
-i am fairly sure that if they took porn off the internet, there would only be one website left and it would be called bring back the porn "Perry cox, Scrubs.

Offline Josh094

  • FH-Betatester
  • ***
  • Posts: 1.629
  • Oh dear.
    • View Profile
    • ProjectBarrett
Re: Plane Physics: Old or new?
« Reply #41 on: 09-07-2010, 23:07:08 »
AH DOUBLE NEGATIVE
Soon the results will be revealed...
What will happen...?
Clearly the outcome wassent never really in doubt


Offline Gunnie

  • Developer
  • ******
  • Posts: 124
    • View Profile
Re: Plane Physics: Old or new?
« Reply #42 on: 09-07-2010, 23:07:19 »
Soon the results will be revealed...
What will happen...?
Clearly the outcome wassent never really in doubt

Who knows?  Super fast airplanes on Normandy maps don't work well. The view distance is not great enough to allow for high speed machines flying around. Especially, when you are also looking at ground targets on some of the "smaller" maps.

On Africa maps, speed is not as much a factor, as the view distances are much greater, so going faster is easier to deal with. As for AT guns not being AA.. Tanks are not AA either, but you can shoot a plane down with a tank.  In fact, even before changes were made to airplanes. You could shoot them down with AT guns and Tanks.. Therefore, that argument is not valid.

In the end, I am not sure what we will do regarding airplanes. Many like how they fly currently, just as many don't like how things are. While this is a BF2 mod. We are not trying to be like BF2, but have our own identity.  This means our own way of how things work and fly. Not EA's. All I can say is if I am told or asked to make adjustments on the machines, then I will. However, until that time. Don't expect anything radical.

Offline SiCaRiO

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1.554
    • View Profile
Re: Plane Physics: Old or new?
« Reply #43 on: 09-07-2010, 23:07:27 »
Soon the results will be revealed...
What will happen...?
Clearly the outcome wassent never really in doubt

.As for AT guns not being AA.. Tanks are not AA either, but you can shoot a plane down with a tank.  In fact, even before changes were made to airplanes. You could shoot them down with AT guns and Tanks.. Therefore, that argument is not valid.


hows that invalid the argument? if i say AA guns kill infantery now just like they killed infantery in previus version , does that make the reduce of the splash damage a dacition made without arguments?

Offline Excavus

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 391
  • Member of the FH2 Cynic Club
    • View Profile
Re: Plane Physics: Old or new?
« Reply #44 on: 09-07-2010, 23:07:28 »
In 2.15 I used to own the skies in a Spitfire all day. I couldn't get shot down. Nowadays I'm easily shot down by out-turning FW190s and ME109s, and regularly shot down by tanks and AT guns. This is why I don't fly anymore post 2.2. The new physics just isn't for me when any new pilot in an FW190 can shoot down 2 P-51s and 2 P-47s before crashing into a church tower.