Author Topic: Battlefield 3  (Read 236303 times)

Offline THeTA0123

  • The north remembers
  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 16.842
    • View Profile
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #735 on: 08-06-2011, 22:06:16 »
Thats probaly the reason Paavo.


IRL you can "Bazooka snipe" but the weapons operate much and much more difficult
-i am fairly sure that if they took porn off the internet, there would only be one website left and it would be called bring back the porn "Perry cox, Scrubs.

Offline LHeureux

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1.350
    • View Profile
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #736 on: 08-06-2011, 22:06:19 »
And what exactly is wrong with that?

Ok exemple how it's bad :

You are sprinting, you get kill. No momentum, you just stop and die.

It's unreal.

Hey, huge ass .gif signatures are totally unnecessary and obnoxious. Not these anymore, thankyouverymany kkbyethx love you, all the homo. -Flippy

Offline Galslacht

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 25
    • View Profile
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #737 on: 08-06-2011, 22:06:51 »



Quote
- New feature called Suppression - all the bullets you fire at an enemy affect them regardless if you hit them or not. All the bullets you fire that get close enough will start to reduce their combat efficiency.
SO thats where FH2 supression system went to!



No man, EA just copied the surpression system from Darkest Hour, and now EA is like *look what we have invented*.

Offline Ciupita

  • Gay Lord
  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 1.581
    • View Profile
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #738 on: 09-06-2011, 00:06:12 »



Quote
- New feature called Suppression - all the bullets you fire at an enemy affect them regardless if you hit them or not. All the bullets you fire that get close enough will start to reduce their combat efficiency.
SO thats where FH2 supression system went to!



No man, EA just copied the surpression system from Darkest Hour, and now EA is like *look what we have invented*.

FH had it before DH.

Offline [130.Pz]S.Lainer

  • FH-Betatester
  • ***
  • Posts: 1.934
    • View Profile
    • 130th
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #739 on: 09-06-2011, 00:06:44 »
  I don't think either mod had what EA is talking about...Sounds like your deviation actually increases when you get suppressed.  Shame we can't do that with FH.
http://www.bfewaw.com/campaigns/waw24/promo/campaign/waw24banner1.png
The purpose of this deployment was to "annoy and defy the United States ... on her with Bofors 40 mm guns from a range of 650

Offline cannonfodder

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1.228
    • View Profile
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #740 on: 09-06-2011, 09:06:14 »
...DICE is doing a bad job at game-making. Sure, they can build engines, but gamemaking is more than that. DICE last good game was BF2. After that, it went all downhill looking through Battlefield-eyes...
You left out BF2142. Just because the futuristic setting wasn't popular doesn't mean it wasn't a good game, in certain respects it was better than BF2... ;)


For the last 5 years, DICE haven't been making bad games, they've just been putting their flagship (BF) first. It's the reason why they pulled the pin on BF1943, finishing it would've delayed BF3.

Aside from 2142, I think it's safe to say all these "offshoots" (BC, etc.) are really nothing more than gap-fillers between BF2 and BF3, serving the dual purpose of keeping the Battlefield brand on the shelf (to keep Activision honest) and serving as a test bed for the Frostbite engine.

Keep in mind that they've been working on the FB engine for years, and as it's one of the first true next-gen engines (optimized for 64-bit, full DX11 support, etc.), I think they can be forgiven for releasing a few, as we BF purists might call them, duds... :)

Offline NTH

  • FH-Betatester
  • ***
  • Posts: 3.146
    • View Profile
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #741 on: 09-06-2011, 10:06:51 »
  I don't think either mod had what EA is talking about...Sounds like your deviation actually increases when you get suppressed.  Shame we can't do that with FH.

And you get rewarded (points) for suppressing the enemy. Hopefully this will encourage teamplay a bit.

If this stays in you can bet there will be heated discussions on the amount of suppression in BF3. In the same way we had the discussions on these forums which cause the suppressing effect to be toned down.


Milton Gault roared, "Roffey, I know bloody well that Jerry knows we are here but you don't need to advertise the fact!"
(From: First in the Field, Gault of the Patricias by Jeffery Williams, page 72.)

Offline von.small

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1.455
  • Last of my kind
    • View Profile
    • WEARMEME
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #742 on: 09-06-2011, 11:06:27 »
Sorry if this is a repost

E3 trailer of Thunder Run level - photorealism, fooooook

http://youtu.be/9UwOrl036_A
HadrianBT - Why the hell would "Germany" attack pigmy ppl??!!
Thorondor123 - I agree that people are not wearing enough hats

Offline Galslacht

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 25
    • View Profile
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #743 on: 09-06-2011, 11:06:54 »
...DICE is doing a bad job at game-making. Sure, they can build engines, but gamemaking is more than that. DICE last good game was BF2. After that, it went all downhill looking through Battlefield-eyes...
You left out BF2142. Just because the futuristic setting wasn't popular doesn't mean it wasn't a good game, in certain respects it was better than BF2... ;)


For the last 5 years, DICE haven't been making bad games, they've just been putting their flagship (BF) first. It's the reason why they pulled the pin on BF1943, finishing it would've delayed BF3.

Aside from 2142, I think it's safe to say all these "offshoots" (BC, etc.) are really nothing more than gap-fillers between BF2 and BF3, serving the dual purpose of keeping the Battlefield brand on the shelf (to keep Activision honest) and serving as a test bed for the Frostbite engine.

Keep in mind that they've been working on the FB engine for years, and as it's one of the first true next-gen engines (optimized for 64-bit, full DX11 support, etc.), I think they can be forgiven for releasing a few, as we BF purists might call them, duds... :)
Well, I'd give DICE the benefit of the doubt with BF3. I'm curious how the release will unfold. How the reactions will be to the game in the first few months after release. DICE has been notorious about the large amount of bugs, unbalances and glitches in it's products so I will see where BF3 will go to.

BF2 had some gamehalting issues after all after the release, and patches didnt solve it but augmentated the problems :D
It took literally years to get a good working at least reasonable balanced product. I noticed the same thing happening with BC2, but DICE seem to have abandoned BC2 with the patchmaking, which is a shame.

Offline Paavopesusieni

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1.401
  • Spongebob
    • View Profile
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #744 on: 09-06-2011, 13:06:16 »
And what exactly is wrong with that?

Ok exemple how it's bad :

You are sprinting, you get kill. No momentum, you just stop and die.

It's unreal.



You're saying BF2 dying is realistic? lol.

Thats probaly the reason Paavo.


IRL you can "Bazooka snipe" but the weapons operate much and much more difficult
Yeah I know that, I know how stuff works I am RDF soilder you know. :P

Offline LHeureux

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1.350
    • View Profile
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #745 on: 09-06-2011, 13:06:40 »
Yes BF2 dying is realistic.
Hey, huge ass .gif signatures are totally unnecessary and obnoxious. Not these anymore, thankyouverymany kkbyethx love you, all the homo. -Flippy

Offline Paavopesusieni

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1.401
  • Spongebob
    • View Profile
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #746 on: 09-06-2011, 13:06:03 »
Yes BF2 dying is realistic.

Flying 20 meters backwards at 100 km/h after M95 headshot, flying 300 meters up in the air by arty shot, hanging on the stairs from your finger tip and shake on the ground like mad man on ruff ground. Realistic, BF2 death animations sucked and have always sucked, one of the things that was never really fixed.

Those deaths are not realistic.

Offline Kelmola

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2.861
    • View Profile
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #747 on: 09-06-2011, 15:06:51 »
E3 trailer of Thunder Run level - photorealism, fooooook
Human faces are still the tricky part ;) What really impressed me though was the BRAAAAP BRAAAP of GAU-8/A 8)

Having grown up on M1 Tank Platoon, though, the sudden scripted appearance of enemies at point-blank range makes me...

...realize that this is not a simulator but another "ghost train" shooter (as far as single player is concerned). :P

Offline THeTA0123

  • The north remembers
  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 16.842
    • View Profile
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #748 on: 09-06-2011, 16:06:52 »



Quote
- New feature called Suppression - all the bullets you fire at an enemy affect them regardless if you hit them or not. All the bullets you fire that get close enough will start to reduce their combat efficiency.
SO thats where FH2 supression system went to!



No man, EA just copied the surpression system from Darkest Hour, and now EA is like *look what we have invented*.

FH had it before DH.
This ^

Now to see what weapons will be implented. If it is AK FOR EVERYONE, RPK, RPG -18 and such, PK ill buy it

I dont give a ratshit about US weapons

minus the Minimi and MAG the US adopted."OH HEY LETS ADOPT A BELGIAN WEAPON BECAUSE WE CANT MAKE A SINGLE PROPER MACHINE GUN, CHANGE 2 THINGS AND CALL IT 100% AMERICAN!
« Last Edit: 09-06-2011, 16:06:39 by THeTA0123 »
-i am fairly sure that if they took porn off the internet, there would only be one website left and it would be called bring back the porn "Perry cox, Scrubs.

Offline Ciupita

  • Gay Lord
  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 1.581
    • View Profile
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #749 on: 09-06-2011, 16:06:39 »
M60 is a great example that they can't make own LMG:s.

Tbh. I don't care if americans can spawn with AKs and such in MP. I just want them to do more damage than in BF2 or BC2.