Author Topic: War Thunder  (Read 118745 times)

Offline THeTA0123

  • The north remembers
  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 16.842
    • View Profile
Re: War Thunder
« Reply #1800 on: 30-01-2015, 12:01:29 »
In its current shape, i think the tiger can be placed at BR 5.3 simular to the sherman jumbo

otherwise, PZG40 needs to be added
-i am fairly sure that if they took porn off the internet, there would only be one website left and it would be called bring back the porn "Perry cox, Scrubs.

Offline Butcher

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1.839
  • ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
    • View Profile
Re: War Thunder
« Reply #1801 on: 30-01-2015, 13:01:48 »
The mobility advantage of the Panther over the Tiger and the better turret traverse speed make the Panther the better tank. The Tiger is not as useful on narrow city maps as the Panther. The turret traverse speed really sucks on the Tiger. Also it is slower and has a bit less penetration. Enough for me to choose the Panther, just keep your distance so you don´t get flanked.
He got banned for our sins. He was not the member FH forums deserved, he was the member we needed.

Offline THeTA0123

  • The north remembers
  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 16.842
    • View Profile
Re: War Thunder
« Reply #1802 on: 30-01-2015, 13:01:24 »
Also the panther has slightly better ammo rack locations. IMO

But the tiger at its own tier, is very deadly and difficult to attack from either angle. Even when they use APDS APCR rounds, they need multiple rounds, you only need one.
-i am fairly sure that if they took porn off the internet, there would only be one website left and it would be called bring back the porn "Perry cox, Scrubs.

Offline Torenico

  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 5.632
  • ¡Viva la Revolución!
    • View Profile
Re: War Thunder
« Reply #1803 on: 31-01-2015, 03:01:38 »
I seem to be the only one that makes impossible shots.

But they're not the good impossible shots, they are ridiculous.

For example, aiming at the sides of a T-34 going from left to right, I shoot, shell magically hits the frontal armor at ridiculous angle, of course, autobounce. Okay.

T-34, again, hulldown. No problem, I'll still open fire with my new Tiger I..., shell hits the side of the turret at a ridiculous angle, bounce again. Hmm..

SU-152 coming downhill at 150mts no more, I have his sides, his huge and weak side, I open fire with my Tiger again, shell hits the tracks and nobody saw it after that, no damage, he turns around and places a HE into my gun mantlet wich explodes and sends lots of tiny fragments that penetrate my hull roof and makes my ammorack go boom, sure thing.

Panzer III J, there's a bot T-28, his sides again, I open fire, track again, no damage, nothing, disappears, reload fast because III J OP, shoot again, shell went for the engine deck at a ridiculous angle and bounces, impossible shot done.


Oh for fucks sake...

Then again, my Tiger I has more Aircraft kills than my Flakpanzer I. Two aircrafts shot down today, a F6F which strafed me, placed a Pzgr39 into his engine setting him on fire and crashing, a few rounds after that, my Tiger platoon was being constantly harassed by a Sturmovik, I managed to shot him down by completely destroying his wing with a nicely placed 88mm shell.


Offline THeTA0123

  • The north remembers
  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 16.842
    • View Profile
Re: War Thunder
« Reply #1804 on: 02-02-2015, 23:02:56 »
49 battles
39 victories (69% win ratio)
35 deaths
193 kills

A K/D of 5.5

This is what the M26, delivered to me. The M82 APC is a god shell..
-i am fairly sure that if they took porn off the internet, there would only be one website left and it would be called bring back the porn "Perry cox, Scrubs.

Offline Torenico

  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 5.632
  • ¡Viva la Revolución!
    • View Profile
Re: War Thunder
« Reply #1805 on: 07-02-2015, 05:02:23 »
« Last Edit: 07-02-2015, 05:02:16 by Torenico »


Offline Sander93

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1.216
    • View Profile
Re: War Thunder
« Reply #1806 on: 07-02-2015, 07:02:31 »
Kinda cool but bad for gameplay. The Russians won't be able to kill it except using special ammo at perfect 90 degree side shots at 10-100 meters distance. Meanwhile the Germans in that slow pos will never be able to capture the objectives and will lose the match anyway, like they already do now most of the time. Americans are probably gonna have some fun with it. Doesn't the M103's 120mm penetrate like 380mm? Patton can easily run circles and get some easy side / rear shots off.
« Last Edit: 07-02-2015, 07:02:12 by Sander93 »

Offline THeTA0123

  • The north remembers
  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 16.842
    • View Profile
Re: War Thunder
« Reply #1807 on: 07-02-2015, 12:02:49 »
The M103 120mm HEAT shells are very bugged and bounce off frontal IS3 armour


But yeah

DAS MAUS!!!!! ABGESCHOSSEN MIT DAS T54
-i am fairly sure that if they took porn off the internet, there would only be one website left and it would be called bring back the porn "Perry cox, Scrubs.

Offline Torenico

  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 5.632
  • ¡Viva la Revolución!
    • View Profile
Re: War Thunder
« Reply #1808 on: 07-02-2015, 16:02:36 »
They could introduce a 9.0 BR along with the Maus...


Offline Mudzin

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 692
    • View Profile
Re: War Thunder
« Reply #1809 on: 07-02-2015, 22:02:18 »
Maus? Finally German tank which can fight against T-54...

Offline THeTA0123

  • The north remembers
  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 16.842
    • View Profile
Re: War Thunder
« Reply #1810 on: 10-02-2015, 11:02:12 »
Good news everyone!
On test server 1.47
The tiger H1 has been put on BR 5.3!
At BR 5.7, the germans now get the Tiger E! Now with PZG40 and 700HP engine!

Also now for 'murica! M26E1 pershing and M42 duster!
-i am fairly sure that if they took porn off the internet, there would only be one website left and it would be called bring back the porn "Perry cox, Scrubs.

Offline Torenico

  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 5.632
  • ¡Viva la Revolución!
    • View Profile
Re: War Thunder
« Reply #1811 on: 10-02-2015, 17:02:40 »
5.3?

hahaha

hahahahaha

xaxaxaxa
XAXAXAXA

HUEHUEHEUHUEHEUHEHEUHEUHEUE


Offline THeTA0123

  • The north remembers
  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 16.842
    • View Profile
Re: War Thunder
« Reply #1812 on: 10-02-2015, 17:02:00 »
my US team with BR 5.3 Sherman jumbo annihalates anything russian

so with the germans, mitt das tiger I

wich actually has a good gun compared to sherman jumbo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ex9GCwCdW_I
-i am fairly sure that if they took porn off the internet, there would only be one website left and it would be called bring back the porn "Perry cox, Scrubs.

Offline Hjaldrgud

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 1.071
  • BF2 Enthusiast
    • View Profile
Re: War Thunder
« Reply #1813 on: 20-02-2015, 15:02:54 »
Where to fire at the goddamn shermans? (from the front)

And what kind of ammo is the best for the T-34's?
« Last Edit: 20-02-2015, 16:02:33 by Hjaldrgud »

"Generous and brave men live the best" -Hávamál

Offline Torenico

  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 5.632
  • ¡Viva la Revolución!
    • View Profile
Re: War Thunder
« Reply #1814 on: 20-02-2015, 17:02:56 »
If you're bouncing from the front of Shermans try to load APCR and aim for where the Radioman is, the ammoracks are on the sides so a penetrating shot there will surely damage them.