Author Topic: War Thunder  (Read 117496 times)

Offline THeTA0123

  • The north remembers
  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 16.842
    • View Profile
Re: War Thunder
« Reply #615 on: 08-08-2013, 17:08:40 »
So yeah, now the tide has switched to the germans. GERMAN BIAAASSSZZZZZZZZ

Are these loadouts historical accurate?

I rather keep my Twin MG 17's in my ME109.
-i am fairly sure that if they took porn off the internet, there would only be one website left and it would be called bring back the porn "Perry cox, Scrubs.

Offline PanzerKnacker

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1.912
  • Tommyjäger
    • View Profile
Re: War Thunder
« Reply #616 on: 08-08-2013, 17:08:20 »
The FW190 is slower and less maneuverable and can mount 4 cannons. Well three cannons are enough anyways and with the speed and climbrate of the 109 the 109 is the better aircraft.

4 MG151? You mean 6 MG 151 ;D

That's 2x7,92mm and 6x20mm, that's an entire anti aircraft battery in one bird ;D

So yeah, now the tide has switched to the germans. GERMAN BIAAASSSZZZZZZZZ

Are these loadouts historical accurate?

I rather keep my Twin MG 17's in my ME109.

"From the F-4 onward, the new 20 mm Mauser MG 151/20 with 200 rounds was used as the Motorkanone.[47] The first F-4s reached frontline units in June 1941. Production lasted exactly a year between May 1941 and May 1942, with 1,841 of all F-4 variants produced.[52] Some of the later models were capable of mounting two 20 mm MG 151/20 cannons under the wing in faired gondolas with 135 rpg. These were designated F-4/R1 and 240 of them were produced by WNF in the first quarter of 1942.[53] This optional additional armament was standardized as field kit for later G and K series." - Wiki
« Last Edit: 08-08-2013, 17:08:39 by PanzerKnacker »
He was not wrong. Amateurs talk tactics, pros talk logistics.

Offline THeTA0123

  • The north remembers
  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 16.842
    • View Profile
Re: War Thunder
« Reply #617 on: 08-08-2013, 17:08:35 »
Okay thank you. I still rather prefer the standard loadout :)
Altough my FW190 will get 4x 20mm's
-i am fairly sure that if they took porn off the internet, there would only be one website left and it would be called bring back the porn "Perry cox, Scrubs.

Offline PanzerKnacker

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1.912
  • Tommyjäger
    • View Profile
Re: War Thunder
« Reply #618 on: 08-08-2013, 17:08:45 »
Imagine the poor Lancasters and B17 mofos, this thing is really gonna tear them a new one

I fly the F4/R1 and the F4 Trop with the standard 1x20mm, it's not really that big of a performance drop, I can still outrun the Yaks.

But it really helps with the heavies in the game, I think I got an A20 in one strafe the other round.
« Last Edit: 08-08-2013, 17:08:46 by PanzerKnacker »
He was not wrong. Amateurs talk tactics, pros talk logistics.

Offline THeTA0123

  • The north remembers
  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 16.842
    • View Profile
Re: War Thunder
« Reply #619 on: 08-08-2013, 18:08:07 »
Problem is, bombers really are underpowered atm

wich is a shame, because i like bombers :(
-i am fairly sure that if they took porn off the internet, there would only be one website left and it would be called bring back the porn "Perry cox, Scrubs.

Offline siben

  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 4.261
    • View Profile
Re: War Thunder
« Reply #620 on: 09-08-2013, 18:08:42 »
Since the new patch whe, i try to aim my AA guns manually everything is inverted (up and down), where do i fix this?

Offline THeTA0123

  • The north remembers
  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 16.842
    • View Profile
Re: War Thunder
« Reply #621 on: 10-08-2013, 16:08:44 »
Flew my little Erika (ME109-E6) trough the canyons of that chinese map. You know, Sea surrounded by gigantic high rocks. Its like a maze

Chased 2 IL-2's going for our ships. I felt like darth vader and couldnt resist myself saying= I have you now!

Gold squadrons attack on our Destroyers was a huge failure! 2 Little Soviet stars to add below my cockpit!
-i am fairly sure that if they took porn off the internet, there would only be one website left and it would be called bring back the porn "Perry cox, Scrubs.

Offline McCloskey

  • Developer
  • ******
  • Posts: 1.298
  • Heart or head, either way Jerry's dead!
    • View Profile
Re: War Thunder
« Reply #622 on: 10-08-2013, 16:08:17 »
there's an E-6? :P

anyway, early Brits suck, but the Spitfire Mark IX and XVI? I DIG (that was before the update, but now they're even more awesome).. seems like I may have been using them a little wrong, now the russians and germans run in horror
« Last Edit: 10-08-2013, 16:08:06 by McCloskey »

Offline THeTA0123

  • The north remembers
  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 16.842
    • View Profile
Re: War Thunder
« Reply #623 on: 10-08-2013, 17:08:12 »
I mean the first ME109 you can buy  ;D
-i am fairly sure that if they took porn off the internet, there would only be one website left and it would be called bring back the porn "Perry cox, Scrubs.

Offline Musti

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1.734
    • View Profile
Re: War Thunder
« Reply #624 on: 10-08-2013, 17:08:37 »
So, has anybody figured this game out? The last patch seems to have turned up the idiocy and randomness all the way to 11. The damage is completely random, arcadey and stupid as shit, Once I put 150 rounds with MG 151/20 to no effect, other times 7.7mm machine guns rip entire wing off in a single burst. The guns feel so weak I'm slowly starting to understand rammers now, It is so frustrating when you shoot an enemy with no effects. The retarded random spread is not helping either, its super stupid esp. on bigger cannons.

BTW. I got a new range record kill: 1.4 kilometers, Me 410 with 50mm cannons sure has its moments.
WARNING!
Assholes are closer than they appear!

Offline Mudzin

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 692
    • View Profile
Re: War Thunder
« Reply #625 on: 10-08-2013, 18:08:10 »
Now you find out that this game bases on pure luck than skill?  ;D

Offline Korsakov829

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1.751
    • View Profile
Re: War Thunder
« Reply #626 on: 10-08-2013, 18:08:52 »
The HELL are you doing opening fire at that range for?

Offline Musti

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1.734
    • View Profile
Re: War Thunder
« Reply #627 on: 10-08-2013, 19:08:19 »
Now you find out that this game bases on pure luck than skill?  ;D
The thing is it used to be better(not MUCH better but better) now it's totally fucked up, even Beufighters with 4x20 mm seem to take long when killing stuff.
The HELL are you doing opening fire at that range for?
I have a plane with an automatic PzIII tank cannon, why shouldn't I? :D I like "sniping" people, after all I just need one good hit, I couldn't catch the guy anyway, so I had no reason not to try and hit him, besides he was flying straight forward (in other word, he was a nice and steady target), It's extremely fun to shoot at a guy that thinks he got away, see the shell fly at him, aaand boom!
WARNING!
Assholes are closer than they appear!

Offline PanzerKnacker

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1.912
  • Tommyjäger
    • View Profile
Re: War Thunder
« Reply #628 on: 10-08-2013, 19:08:28 »
What's with the new "ammo" icon by the plane icons in the hangar? and added price of the 20mm pods ammunition?
He was not wrong. Amateurs talk tactics, pros talk logistics.

Offline Butcher

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1.839
  • ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
    • View Profile
Re: War Thunder
« Reply #629 on: 10-08-2013, 19:08:44 »
What's with the new "ammo" icon by the plane icons in the hangar? and added price of the 20mm pods ammunition?

Every 30 reloads you have to buy the pod guns new for a whooping 9400 silver. Don´t know whether the regular ammo costs you also, but I think it´s cheaper. There are some silver lions shown on your regular ammo also but that´s only 5 or so silver lions per reload (?).
He got banned for our sins. He was not the member FH forums deserved, he was the member we needed.