bingo. Its their SOVEREIGN property. The suggestion forum is to get external feedback, additions and alternatives that they might CONSIDER. They barely take suggestions not beccause its their perogative to do so, but because after consideration, it may not be the time for it, may not fit into the gameplay, or its already in the works...
But they do consider them, even the most silly ones... At least they read them, and put brain energy into them. If you ever see a dev give feedback to a suggestion - And I can bet you'd get at least one of such in each suggestion, then that means its at least been noted
Here's SOME suggestions that made it in:
1/Deployable mgs
2/ 3D Ironsights
3/ Scoped FG43
4/ proned version of LMGs
5/ Reload animation for M1 garand
6/ Reduced suppression... yes, we DID suggest that
7/ Reduced deviation for mgs in prone position
6/ Reduced accuracy, Bren
7/ Airplane handling
8/ Hellcat
9/ Alternate faces for player model
10/ Normandy
11/ Ramelle Neuville
12/ Mobile artillery
13/ The Soviets
14/ the Hetzer
15/ Stug without remote mg
16/ A train
16/ Uniqueness to Ramelle Neuville skins, and other toys like the 'molotov' cocktail, BAR without bipod, fly-overs
17/ Italian-specific equipment
18/ Italian coat
19/ The Quad .50
20/ Mobile ack-ack
top mention but a few.....
Now, while we ponder of the additions that may well have been as a result of community suggestions, can we keep the devs motivated to DO what they've decided to do out of the goodness of their own heart? Without imposing or accusing them?