Author Topic: War Thunder  (Read 117296 times)

Offline THeTA0123

  • The north remembers
  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 16.842
    • View Profile
Re: War Thunder
« Reply #1695 on: 05-11-2014, 00:11:39 »


So in this case my 88 round should have penetrated the IS turret...
And how about 57mm T34 penetrating frontal Tiger hull?? Far from historical accuracy...
If you hitted the gun mantlet, then no, it shouldnt have penetrated. And with the slope and curves in mind of the turret armour itself, then it is very unlikely that your shot would have penetrated

And at 10 meter range, with APCR ammo, and even with standard ammo, the Zis-2 was more then capable in penetrating the Tiger tank frontal hull armour

Hmm... Didn't know that Tiger was already obsolete construction before first vehicle left factory...
Technically, it was, as it used the same construction methods as the PZIV. A tank technically obsolete by 1940 compared to the T34 and Sherman tank

Especially expensive to produce is the hull armour. When the russians tried this on the IS2 hull, they too realised this was an obsolete technique, in wich they just want one flat sloped back 50 degrees

Keep in mind that much of the stories are overgloried by historians. We have been pumped into our heads that german tanks were "mighty" when in reality, it was the crews and defensive nature of the war, that made them being able to score more kills. That and, carrying more frontal armor.
And some allied generals who still tought by 1944 that the shermans 75mm gun was "fine"


Stupid yanks!
-i am fairly sure that if they took porn off the internet, there would only be one website left and it would be called bring back the porn "Perry cox, Scrubs.

Offline Musti

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1.734
    • View Profile
Re: War Thunder
« Reply #1696 on: 05-11-2014, 00:11:42 »
Yah
Also, the germans responded quite well to new threats, constantly up-gunning their tanks and/or developing new AT guns.
WARNING!
Assholes are closer than they appear!

Offline THeTA0123

  • The north remembers
  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 16.842
    • View Profile
Re: War Thunder
« Reply #1697 on: 05-11-2014, 09:11:08 »
Also 50% of the allied tank losses in normandy were solely caused by the Pak 40. Wich even furthers diminishes the german KD ratio.

-i am fairly sure that if they took porn off the internet, there would only be one website left and it would be called bring back the porn "Perry cox, Scrubs.

Offline Battlefieldfan45 (CroPanzer)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1.531
  • Gebalte? Anyone?
    • View Profile
Re: War Thunder
« Reply #1698 on: 05-11-2014, 11:11:12 »
I never thought I was going to say this but...

CAN'T WAIT FOR THOSE SEXY SHERMANS!
Also, the M103 looks nice and, my God, that M6 hvy... how is anyone gonna miss that one.

 
Playing WoT with ingame nick: CroPanzer

Offline siben

  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 4.261
    • View Profile
Re: War Thunder
« Reply #1699 on: 05-11-2014, 18:11:24 »
I never thought I was going to say this but...

CAN'T WAIT FOR THOSE SEXY SHERMANS!
Also, the M103 looks nice and, my God, that M6 hvy... how is anyone gonna miss that one.

I have a sherman 75mm, it is not really that good i find.

Offline Battlefieldfan45 (CroPanzer)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1.531
  • Gebalte? Anyone?
    • View Profile
Re: War Thunder
« Reply #1700 on: 05-11-2014, 19:11:26 »
Well, I don't really think shermans will pwn, I just see them nice looking  ;D
But that walker bulldog and the chaffee, they might do some tricks  8)

 
Playing WoT with ingame nick: CroPanzer

Offline Sander93

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1.216
    • View Profile
Re: War Thunder
« Reply #1701 on: 06-11-2014, 09:11:20 »
Sherman 76mm, Hellcat, M10, Chaffee, M41, T29, M103, perhaps even the Pershings. They all seem like good and fun tanks.

Offline Butcher

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1.839
  • ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
    • View Profile
Re: War Thunder
« Reply #1702 on: 06-11-2014, 10:11:41 »
Is there any statement what they are going to do with the MG gunners? There is a perk you can train them with, but atm that seems useless.
He got banned for our sins. He was not the member FH forums deserved, he was the member we needed.

Offline THeTA0123

  • The north remembers
  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 16.842
    • View Profile
Re: War Thunder
« Reply #1703 on: 06-11-2014, 11:11:11 »
Is there any statement what they are going to do with the MG gunners? There is a perk you can train them with, but atm that seems useless.
The eventuall plan is to also include infantry squads. That can be deployed and such. and even anti-tank guns. To simulate a proper battlefield. Then, coaxial MG's will also become avaiable.
-i am fairly sure that if they took porn off the internet, there would only be one website left and it would be called bring back the porn "Perry cox, Scrubs.

Offline Musti

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1.734
    • View Profile
Re: War Thunder
« Reply #1704 on: 06-11-2014, 15:11:40 »
Sherman 76mm, Hellcat, M10, Chaffee, M41, T29, M103, perhaps even the Pershings. They all seem like good and fun tanks.
Apart from all those, I really want  to try M3 Lee, since this game has working multi turreted tanks, it could be interesting :D.
WARNING!
Assholes are closer than they appear!

Offline Mudzin

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 692
    • View Profile
Re: War Thunder
« Reply #1705 on: 11-11-2014, 00:11:02 »
Tiger gun accuracy comparing to Russian tanks is so laughable... I have the feeling that I drive Wespe or sth like that... Going to stick rather with planes... Still tank driving is better in FH2....

Offline Airshark79

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 454
    • View Profile
Re: War Thunder
« Reply #1706 on: 11-11-2014, 00:11:29 »
GF tanks are either sluggish as fuck or they are some drifting beasts.

Too easy to pull a ninja on a pz3n and swing behind a heavy while avoiding shots. It is absurd being almost always succesful pulling shit like that.

Realistic? I never see a commander a few meters above the hatch.

Offline SiCaRiO

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1.554
    • View Profile
Re: War Thunder
« Reply #1707 on: 11-11-2014, 13:11:16 »
Tiger gun accuracy comparing to Russian tanks is so laughable... I have the feeling that I drive Wespe or sth like that... Going to stick rather with planes... Still tank driving is better in FH2....

are you for real? I always land my first shot in my tiger and most of the time they die with 1 hit, the tiger has an amazing accuaracy, in Poland, I just stay at the woods and the Russians cant even hit me from 1200 meters, I just pick them one by one when they try to enter the town.

You are doing something very very wrong.

Offline Mudzin

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 692
    • View Profile
Re: War Thunder
« Reply #1708 on: 11-11-2014, 13:11:51 »
Tiger gun accuracy comparing to Russian tanks is so laughable... I have the feeling that I drive Wespe or sth like that... Going to stick rather with planes... Still tank driving is better in FH2....

are you for real? I always land my first shot in my tiger and most of the time they die with 1 hit, the tiger has an amazing accuaracy, in Poland, I just stay at the woods and the Russians cant even hit me from 1200 meters, I just pick them one by one when they try to enter the town.

You are doing something very very wrong.

Maybe that's how it is in Arcade mode... I play in simulator mode and Tiger is the worst German tank for IIIrd tier... I got even more kills with Panzer IIIM...  ::)

Offline THeTA0123

  • The north remembers
  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 16.842
    • View Profile
Re: War Thunder
« Reply #1709 on: 11-11-2014, 14:11:40 »
No problems with tiger tank in simulator mode :/
-i am fairly sure that if they took porn off the internet, there would only be one website left and it would be called bring back the porn "Perry cox, Scrubs.