Author Topic: Battlefield 3  (Read 236221 times)

Offline Alakazou

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1.368
  • FHer from the beginning
    • View Profile
Battlefield 3
« on: 10-06-2009, 22:06:19 »

Offline Captain Pyjama Shark

  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 5.281
  • Captain of the Gravy Train
    • View Profile
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #1 on: 10-06-2009, 22:06:42 »
Kind of yay.

Offline Flippy Warbear

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 6.921
  • Adequately docile
    • View Profile
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #2 on: 10-06-2009, 22:06:04 »
Oh shit...

Offline Fuchs

  • No lollygagging
  • FH-Betatester
  • ***
  • Posts: 6.655
  • Traction Wars Propaganda Officer
    • View Profile
    • Traction Wars - WWII Free to Play Game
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #3 on: 10-06-2009, 22:06:01 »
Aye mates, theres is no hope ahead. Although I am sure we will be disappointed it's better then nothing.
"Force answers force, war breeds war, and death only brings death.
To break this vicious circle one must do more than act without thought or doubt."

Offline Niam

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 154
    • View Profile
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #4 on: 10-06-2009, 23:06:17 »
I wonder what scenario they gonna chose...

Offline Alakazou

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1.368
  • FHer from the beginning
    • View Profile
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #5 on: 10-06-2009, 23:06:12 »
Modern... I guess.

Offline Niam

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 154
    • View Profile
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #6 on: 10-06-2009, 23:06:18 »
Modern... I guess.

Mhh, the fact that they're doing BF1943 points to it too. Pity...
« Last Edit: 10-06-2009, 23:06:31 by Niam »

Offline Cory the Otter

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2.815
  • Smoke me a kipper, I'll be home for breakfast.
    • View Profile
    • FA Profile
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #7 on: 10-06-2009, 23:06:53 »
Now i'm pissed...

Offline Captain Pyjama Shark

  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 5.281
  • Captain of the Gravy Train
    • View Profile
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #8 on: 10-06-2009, 23:06:30 »
I'm almost glad that it's modern, it would be painful to see the Second World War after what I know now.

[130.Pz]S.Tiemann

  • Guest
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #9 on: 10-06-2009, 23:06:21 »
God help them if the player limit is less than 64. On the other hand they would win my respect if they increased it, think of the possibilities.

Offline THeTA0123

  • The north remembers
  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 16.842
    • View Profile
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #10 on: 10-06-2009, 23:06:58 »
The cold war would have been a nice theme........

And if EA was smart, they would made tanking a bit like current FH2 tanking..

And ofcourse many and many diffrent kinds of vehicles, not just one tank, APC, SPAAG per army

But then again, it is and still is And remains EA
-i am fairly sure that if they took porn off the internet, there would only be one website left and it would be called bring back the porn "Perry cox, Scrubs.

[130.Pz]S.Tiemann

  • Guest
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #11 on: 10-06-2009, 23:06:40 »
The cold war would have been a nice theme........

And if EA was smart, they would made tanking a bit like current FH2 tanking..

And ofcourse many and many diffrent kinds of vehicles, not just one tank, APC, SPAAG per army

But then again, it is and still is And remains EA
They had Multiple tanks in 42, the reason that they dont in bf2 is because the usa only uses one MBT so if they were to make say a cold war game there is the possibility of at least 2 tanks per nation.

Offline Archimonday

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1.197
  • Sir vis pacem, para bellum!
    • View Profile
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #12 on: 10-06-2009, 23:06:30 »
I'm Excited, long time fan, and I will not hesitate to buy this, even if it sucks. Hell I bought their PS2 iteration, and that sucked, but I still have it. I own every battlefield game to date. Why stop now?

Offline THeTA0123

  • The north remembers
  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 16.842
    • View Profile
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #13 on: 10-06-2009, 23:06:07 »
The cold war would have been a nice theme........

And if EA was smart, they would made tanking a bit like current FH2 tanking..

And ofcourse many and many diffrent kinds of vehicles, not just one tank, APC, SPAAG per army

But then again, it is and still is And remains EA
They had Multiple tanks in 42, the reason that they dont in bf2 is because the usa only uses one MBT so if they were to make say a cold war game there is the possibility of at least 2 tanks per nation.
More please

Soviets= T-64   T-72   T-80
USA=M48    M60    M1

If a cold war really erupted, in the end, it would probaly look like this

Old types like the Pattons or Even T-62 would be pressed into service(Since they where built so massivly)

If EA makes a new Battlefield, i hope they do this

-Way more vehicles and Vehicle types
-Re-introduction of mannable Artillery
-Diffrent types of Ammo
-Decent Balance between Anti-tank vs Tank and Anti-air vs Air( Bf2 was horrible on the last one..)
-128 players
-This time, Decent support(Doubt it)

If it is modern or Cold war(I prefer cold war though ;D), all fine by me, but no more World war 2 please. Let us stick to Forgotten hope for this
Then again, only hopes.......But im defiantly buying it
-i am fairly sure that if they took porn off the internet, there would only be one website left and it would be called bring back the porn "Perry cox, Scrubs.

Offline Flippy Warbear

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 6.921
  • Adequately docile
    • View Profile
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #14 on: 10-06-2009, 23:06:23 »
I'm Excited, long time fan, and I will not hesitate to buy this, even if it sucks. Hell I bought their PS2 iteration, and that sucked, but I still have it. I own every battlefield game to date. Why stop now?

Oh Christ...

 :P