Author Topic: Battlefield 3  (Read 236565 times)

Offline Alakazou

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1.368
  • FHer from the beginning
    • View Profile
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #675 on: 30-05-2011, 01:05:12 »
when is forgotten hope 3 being released???????
When it's done :)

Offline Zeno

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1.154
    • View Profile
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #676 on: 30-05-2011, 01:05:14 »
Selective fire?
Was confirmed in some dev video.

Edit;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ylU8M5KwI3o&t=4m20s



there will also be different ammo types^^

Offline Kev4000

  • Developer
  • ******
  • Posts: 1.039
  • FH2 "special" coder
    • View Profile
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #677 on: 30-05-2011, 01:05:41 »
Damage and Accuracy.
Accuracy - should be able to get 50% hit ratio out to 125m.
Damage - 3 shot M16, 2 shot AK47. Naturally exceptions if they're using a more complex damage system.
Only game that got this good so far: Battlefield Vietnam.

But Battlefield 2 damage system, just meh.
M16 requires 4 body shots vs regular people, 5 shots vs ppl with body armour.
The AK101, which uses the same caliber, only needs 3 vs regular ppl!

Hopefully their "military advisors" have advised them on what bullets do to the human body.
And hopefully they haven't been testing weapon accuracy with those airsofts in the background there. As is so obvious with Battlefield 2.

Offline Natty

  • Developer
  • ******
  • Posts: 3.170
    • View Profile
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #678 on: 30-05-2011, 08:05:51 »
And hopefully they haven't been testing weapon accuracy with those airsofts in the background there. As is so obvious with Battlefield 2.

no, they did not test accuracy with airSoft guns for BF2. lol  ;D

Offline Musti

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1.734
    • View Profile
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #679 on: 30-05-2011, 15:05:35 »
After playing BF2 i was certain they did! but if you say so.
If BF3 doesn't have random deviation when aiming through sights (or VERY little) I'm definitely going to buy it!
If it does then i wouldn't be so sure that i do
WARNING!
Assholes are closer than they appear!

Offline Stefan

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 802
    • View Profile
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #680 on: 30-05-2011, 18:05:05 »
After playing BF2 i was certain they did! but if you say so.
If BF3 doesn't have random deviation when aiming through sights (or VERY little) I'm definitely going to buy it!
If it does then i wouldn't be so sure that i do

i thought i was the only one thinking it was weird that bullets came out at a 30 degree angle and did less damage than an airsoft rifle as you say.
"It is the function of the CIA to keep the world unstable, and to propagandize and teach the American people to hate and fear, so we will let the Establishment spend any amount of money on arms."

Offline General Tso

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 351
  • Head Chump
    • View Profile
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #681 on: 01-06-2011, 19:06:44 »
Demize99 was a BF modder, right?  POE? Desert Combat? 

Offline Yustax

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2.020
  • German bias forevah!
    • View Profile

Offline MaJ.P.Bouras

  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 3.210
  • A Hellenic version of Jackie Chan.
    • View Profile
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #683 on: 03-06-2011, 19:06:06 »
Quote
Battlelog will be available for the monthly fee of (drum roll)... zero dollars. We look forward to providing more information on these features in the near future!

I loled !

Offline THeTA0123

  • The north remembers
  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 16.842
    • View Profile
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #684 on: 03-06-2011, 19:06:44 »

But Battlefield 2 damage system, just meh.
M16 requires 4 body shots vs regular people, 5 shots vs ppl with body armour.
The AK101, which uses the same caliber, only needs 3 vs regular ppl!

Keep in mind, that there is a huge diffrence between the 5.45x39mm and the 5.56x45 NATO round

The 5.45x39 had a slightly shorter range, but damage wise, it is far deadlier then the 5.56
There is a tiny hole at the tip of the bullet, once the round hits a target, the bullet tilts vertically and has an unusual, but damaging pattern of causing flesh trauma. that way, causing a much huger wound then with a 5.56mm nato round

NATO doesnt use such a round, because it is forbidden.
« Last Edit: 03-06-2011, 19:06:34 by THeTA0123 »
-i am fairly sure that if they took porn off the internet, there would only be one website left and it would be called bring back the porn "Perry cox, Scrubs.

Offline G.Drew

  • FH-Betatester
  • ***
  • Posts: 1.627
  • FH player since 0.65
    • View Profile
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #685 on: 03-06-2011, 19:06:32 »
Hollow points. Gotta hate them.
"Accept the challenges so that you may feel the exhilaration of victory" - Gen. George S. Patton
-you aren't allowed to have nice things.

Offline THeTA0123

  • The north remembers
  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 16.842
    • View Profile
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #686 on: 03-06-2011, 19:06:11 »
Hollow points. Gotta hate them.
A sort of yes, but the principle is the same
The bullet however, keeps the penetrating capacity of a .223 remington
-i am fairly sure that if they took porn off the internet, there would only be one website left and it would be called bring back the porn "Perry cox, Scrubs.

Offline cannonfodder

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1.228
    • View Profile
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #687 on: 05-06-2011, 05:06:29 »
Quote
...The multiplayer map, “Operation Métro,” available for press to play on the show floor...

 - http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/battlefield_bad_company/archive/2011/06/03/bf3-goes-to-e3.aspx


I guess that means we'll be flogging the crap out of 'Op. Metro' very soon... ;)

Offline Yustax

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2.020
  • German bias forevah!
    • View Profile
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #688 on: 05-06-2011, 08:06:40 »
That means that after the obvious french surrender, the USMC came and saved the day. Wonder against who we'll fight.

Offline mallow234

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 13
    • View Profile
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #689 on: 05-06-2011, 08:06:35 »
That means that after the obvious french surrender, the USMC came and saved the day. Wonder against who we'll fight.

Probably either Russians or some sort of Communist/Dictatorial State.
Probably these PLR Chaps we've been hearing about.