Author Topic: Caspian Sea monster in detail  (Read 3032 times)

Offline sn00x

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2.404
    • View Profile
« Last Edit: 24-03-2010, 11:03:13 by Sn00x »

Offline DLFReporter

  • FH-Betatester
  • ***
  • Posts: 4.727
  • Betatesting FH2 makes me edgy...
    • View Profile
Re: Caspian Sea monster in detail
« Reply #16 on: 24-03-2010, 11:03:59 »
A nice graph of Ground Effect Planes you have there snoox. :)

Edit: I do wonder why the Lippish is displayed along the Russian fleet.
« Last Edit: 24-03-2010, 11:03:32 by N24Reporter »
Gravity is a habit that is hard to shake off

Offline Battlefieldfan45 (CroPanzer)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1.531
  • Gebalte? Anyone?
    • View Profile
Re: Caspian Sea monster in detail
« Reply #17 on: 24-03-2010, 11:03:54 »
Russians PWN everything  8)
That had to be expensive!

 
Playing WoT with ingame nick: CroPanzer

Offline von.small

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1.455
  • Last of my kind
    • View Profile
    • WEARMEME
Re: Caspian Sea monster in detail
« Reply #18 on: 24-03-2010, 13:03:40 »
CoD MW3 will have this
HadrianBT - Why the hell would "Germany" attack pigmy ppl??!!
Thorondor123 - I agree that people are not wearing enough hats

Offline Kubador

  • FH-Betatester
  • ***
  • Posts: 1.531
  • Flippin' Warbears since 1988
    • View Profile
Re: Caspian Sea monster in detail
« Reply #19 on: 24-03-2010, 13:03:34 »
The plane in first post is a military LUN not caspian sea monster. You can see the diference in snoox's picture.

Offline Rawhide

  • Part-time Cowboy
  • FH-Betatester
  • ***
  • Posts: 3.878
  • King of the Off-Topic Section
    • View Profile
    • #fhmod
Re: Caspian Sea monster in detail
« Reply #20 on: 24-03-2010, 19:03:40 »
It's so beautiful I wanna cry

Offline Schneider

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1.695
  • Ofw.Josef_Schneider
    • View Profile
Re: Caspian Sea monster in detail
« Reply #21 on: 24-03-2010, 19:03:11 »
It reminds me of a cormorant, somehow...

Offline Herc

  • Developer
  • ******
  • Posts: 110
    • View Profile
Re: Caspian Sea monster in detail
« Reply #22 on: 25-03-2010, 00:03:17 »
The plane in first post is a military LUN not caspian sea monster. You can see the diference in snoox's picture.

Correct, I just went with something people were more familiar with ;D

Offline Mspfc Doc DuFresne

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 677
  • A Poet and I didn't Know It
    • View Profile
Re: Caspian Sea monster in detail
« Reply #23 on: 25-03-2010, 05:03:43 »
Boeing has a concept for one of these too, for a 1400ton capacity long range transport, called the Boeing Pelican.

Twilight - the movie is just like Schindler's list... You know you're watching a crime against humanity, but it's sort of entertaining.~~Ts4EVER

Offline DLFReporter

  • FH-Betatester
  • ***
  • Posts: 4.727
  • Betatesting FH2 makes me edgy...
    • View Profile
Re: Caspian Sea monster in detail
« Reply #24 on: 25-03-2010, 10:03:23 »
1400ton capacity? They have to be kidding. Where is the sense in that, with those weightloads a flat containership still has the best efficiency.
Gravity is a habit that is hard to shake off

Offline Kubador

  • FH-Betatester
  • ***
  • Posts: 1.531
  • Flippin' Warbears since 1988
    • View Profile
Re: Caspian Sea monster in detail
« Reply #25 on: 25-03-2010, 13:03:58 »
1400ton capacity? They have to be kidding. Where is the sense in that, with those weightloads a flat containership still has the best efficiency.

But not the speed.

Offline siben

  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 4.261
    • View Profile
Re: Caspian Sea monster in detail
« Reply #26 on: 25-03-2010, 13:03:24 »
Correct me if i am wrong, but i always tough that these things where designed for invading a country that was separated by a large ocean. Like the USA. These things would fly in very low, and very fast under the radar surprising the US. Something regular planes or boats would never be able to do. They could also bring large amounts of troops and heavy equipment in at enormous rates.

Offline DLFReporter

  • FH-Betatester
  • ***
  • Posts: 4.727
  • Betatesting FH2 makes me edgy...
    • View Profile
Re: Caspian Sea monster in detail
« Reply #27 on: 25-03-2010, 14:03:44 »
But not the speed.

That is true, but trying to build an airframe for such a weight is just... let us say a bit hard to do, since the total weight of the craft would then most likely exceed 1800 tonnes. Try landing that somewhere on land as they intend to do according to the text or on a sea that isn't calm. ^^

I will only believe it, when I see it.
Gravity is a habit that is hard to shake off

Offline FatJoe

  • Developer
  • ******
  • Posts: 686
  • An old timer
    • View Profile
    • My internet
Re: Caspian Sea monster in detail
« Reply #28 on: 25-03-2010, 17:03:01 »
Siben, yes.. That's what the Soviet military had interest for.

These things would fly across the ocean at high speed and low height giving the Soviets an advantage of reaching their destination before the Americans could react accordingly, as well as transport Heavy Equipment like you said, like tanks and such.. or so I read some long time ago.

Since I first saw it I've been wanting to see these things alive and working. These behemoths are one of those things that underlines that eery feel of the Cold War.. The evolution of new technology.. The seeming possibility of... anything. Beautiful behemoths!

Nice find Herc!

Offline Mspfc Doc DuFresne

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 677
  • A Poet and I didn't Know It
    • View Profile
Re: Caspian Sea monster in detail
« Reply #29 on: 26-03-2010, 03:03:40 »
Yes, 1400 ton capacity. It was designed to carry 17 M1 abrams at once. At sea level it would have traveled at 240 knots for a 10000 mile range; at altitude, 360 knots for a 6000mile range. Yes, the masses are great and the engineering challenges would have been enormous, but it does allow you to carry tremendous weights at high speeds.
Twilight - the movie is just like Schindler's list... You know you're watching a crime against humanity, but it's sort of entertaining.~~Ts4EVER