Author Topic: Operation Lüttich 64  (Read 14819 times)

Offline phillip

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 349
    • View Profile
Re: Operation Lüttich 64
« Reply #30 on: 02-11-2009, 16:11:49 »
I think alot of people like the map.  It may play completely differently when there are not 15 people running around with zooks/shreks.

I think the church is isolated because Allies have to practically run past The west town flag to get there.  Atleast it feels like it.

Offline Die Happy

  • FH-Betatester
  • ***
  • Posts: 1.758
  • Live Long & Die Happy
    • View Profile
Re: Operation Lüttich 64
« Reply #31 on: 02-11-2009, 17:11:04 »
but you would take out a flag that people use

wouldnt it make more sense to take out the flag that people dont use ?


i wouldnt take out anything btw ;)
Live Long & Die Happy

Offline Kelmola

  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2.861
    • View Profile
Re: Operation Lüttich 64
« Reply #32 on: 02-11-2009, 18:11:12 »
Instead of taking away flags, I would consider either adding a fifth flag, OR having something like a mortar battery at the church to make it more interesting. The map is compact as is, it would become too crowded if the church flag is taken away; Gazala is much bigger.

Though personally, I find the church interesting due to the flamethrower, which is epic no matter how many schreck kits you might have. Gotta love how the tankers panic when you fire it at them and roast the passengers riding on the deck at the same time. (Memo to self: do not run forwards when firing that thing.) Hmmm. Maybe MOAR FLAMETHROWERS there to make it even more interesting for us pyromaniacs? Those things would be mighty useful when clearing the city, so getting them would be a priority no matter which side you're on.

Offline General_Henry

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1.460
    • View Profile
Re: Operation Lüttich 64
« Reply #33 on: 03-11-2009, 14:11:52 »
but you would take out a flag that people use

wouldnt it make more sense to take out the flag that people dont use ?


i wouldnt take out anything btw ;)

I suppose there're reasons that a beautiful church and a beautiful town exist...

Offline Slayer

  • Freeze Veteran
  • FH-Betatester
  • ***
  • Posts: 4.125
    • View Profile
Re: Operation Lüttich 64
« Reply #34 on: 05-11-2009, 00:11:03 »
I think the farm is beautiful, too.

Offline ajappat

  • "Cheater"
  • Hero Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2.599
    • View Profile
Re: Operation Lüttich 64
« Reply #35 on: 11-01-2010, 17:01:23 »
Map plays much better now without bazooka spam. I never liked it much as it was before but now it was damn good.

Offline Torenico

  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 5.632
  • ¡Viva la Revolución!
    • View Profile
Re: Operation Lüttich 64
« Reply #36 on: 30-01-2010, 03:01:58 »
^ Exactly, the map is so much better now.

I had some BoB "Scenes" or reenacts in this map :P


Offline THeTA0123

  • The north remembers
  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 16.842
    • View Profile
Re: Operation Lüttich 64
« Reply #37 on: 30-01-2010, 18:01:43 »
The fights in Mortain are always intresting
-i am fairly sure that if they took porn off the internet, there would only be one website left and it would be called bring back the porn "Perry cox, Scrubs.

Offline THeTA0123

  • The north remembers
  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 16.842
    • View Profile
Re: Operation Lüttich 64
« Reply #38 on: 19-02-2010, 10:02:34 »
In my opinion, the Panzerschrecks should be removed. It is simply to much for an allied tanker.
For comparision, the germans have 4 medium tanks and one armored car
Now the allies have 2 sherman tanks with 75MM guns, 1 76MM sherman and 1 M10 TD. With 2 Light tanks.
All german tanks can take down the allied ones, even the Puma.
The shermans need to go to the sides of the Medium panzers, the TD and 76MM sherman need special ammo to kill the thougest. The Light tanks require lots of skill to be effective against the Stug and PzIV

And then you have to count 5-7 panzerschrecks??? It is simply to much.

The map statistics do not lie=
http://fh2.bfstats.info/map.php?map=operation_luttich&maptype=64

I played OP luttich the past week many times, and i barely won. Even with the Famous Lumberjack commando

edit= This is not to declare german bias. Or not whining. It is a complaint over quiet some people that the panzerschrecks on Luttich are simply to much.

-i am fairly sure that if they took porn off the internet, there would only be one website left and it would be called bring back the porn "Perry cox, Scrubs.

Offline Ts4EVER

  • Banner of THeTA0123
  • Developer
  • ******
  • Posts: 7.812
    • View Profile
Re: Operation Lüttich 64
« Reply #39 on: 19-02-2010, 13:02:50 »
And the G43s can go to pickup only too!

Offline Eat Uranium

  • Tea Drinker
  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 4.569
  • Today's news will contain [REDACTED]
    • View Profile
    • FH2 Music
Re: Operation Lüttich 64
« Reply #40 on: 19-02-2010, 13:02:18 »
In my opinion, the Panzerschrecks should be removed.
Long have I said this.  Since even before 2.2.  No shrecks on the spawn menu!

Offline THeTA0123

  • The north remembers
  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 16.842
    • View Profile
Re: Operation Lüttich 64
« Reply #41 on: 19-02-2010, 15:02:34 »
And the G43s can go to pickup only too!
actually  they can stay, i have no problem with them

But the spawnable Panzerschrecks is just to much
-i am fairly sure that if they took porn off the internet, there would only be one website left and it would be called bring back the porn "Perry cox, Scrubs.

Offline Ts4EVER

  • Banner of THeTA0123
  • Developer
  • ******
  • Posts: 7.812
    • View Profile
Re: Operation Lüttich 64
« Reply #42 on: 19-02-2010, 20:02:27 »
And the G43s can go to pickup only too!
actually  they can stay, i have no problem with them


I think they should be removed, for the sake of historical accuracy. The G43 was a rather rare supplementary weapon, not the main infantry rifle. And the balancing concerns about this are quite ridiculus. Both the Garand and K98k are insta gib weapons and unless you are in real close combat or room to room fighting I don't see the Garand having that huge of an edge. And even if it was the case: Nobody is complaining about the Germans having better tanks on most maps, why shouldn't the Americans have their historical advantage?
The heavy German tanks are mostly balanced out by airpower and more American tanks. Why not balance out the Garands by giving the Germans more lmgs (after all, there tactics were pretty much based around them).

Offline THeTA0123

  • The north remembers
  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 16.842
    • View Profile
Re: Operation Lüttich 64
« Reply #43 on: 20-02-2010, 00:02:00 »
Well then, the tank balacing you just said, issent done always

Falaise pocket, Luttich, Goodwood

Where is this so called airpower? present on 2 maps on wich the planes get ripped apart

The allies had 2 things better then the germans= Airpower and Artillery.
Tbh, none of the above are implented in FH2 atm

but i did some more searching and indeed, it is true about the G43. You are absolutely right
-i am fairly sure that if they took porn off the internet, there would only be one website left and it would be called bring back the porn "Perry cox, Scrubs.

Offline Natty

  • Developer
  • ******
  • Posts: 3.170
    • View Profile
Re: Operation Lüttich 64
« Reply #44 on: 22-02-2010, 21:02:14 »
On Luttich in 2.25 axis can spawn with 32x0.1 shrecks. that is 3.2, Not 5-7 as you say.