And what are you trying to tell me with this?
Your pictures of the "war time pattern tan/water camo" are pictures of cheap reproductions that look nothing like the real "tan/water" camo. You want the uniforms to look like that? You have to be nuts.
Nice that you own a BGS tunic. Those are getting sought after lately. But when you have the privilege to own one of these, you should actually take a close look at them before you make silly comments on the forums.
Of course I can follow how you come to the conclusion that on the render you see a post war camo pattern. Pattern is similar, colors are almost the same, they are easy to mix up for somebody who doesn't know much about it.
I have a little task for you. Try to find out what the reversed Splittertarn pattern is and with a bit of imagination you might be able to figure out how a render of pants in a pattern that is a mix betwen reversed Splittertarn and Sumpftarn occured.
HAHAHHAAHHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHHAAH
Dude, I defy you. DEFY YOU, to prove that the wartime camo I just showed you is incorrect in any way, shape, or form. I utterly defy you to do that. The camo pattern on those trousers right now is a post-war BGS. I pointed that out to Kev the moment I saw it. He told me that Remdul has fixed it internally, and that they posted the incorrect renders. I posted a photo set, off Wehrmacht awards forum (if you don't know what that is, its basically a forum of guys who could put me and taranov to shame) showing varying patterns of BGS camo. They are IDENTICAL to the camo pattern on those trousers.
M44 Tan/Water was a MUCH different camo than splinter. It was darker, more mustardy, the edges were blurred and rounded off. The M43 type, much rarer, is closer to what you have, with distint borders, but still far off:
(Note, this is an ORIGINAL 43 type tan/water parka)