Poll

More Maps With Objective Mode,s

Yes
54 (93.1%)
No
4 (6.9%)

Total Members Voted: 58

Voting closed: 03-01-2012, 03:01:08

Author Topic: Poll: Objective Mode  (Read 4281 times)

Offline djinn

  • Masterspammer
  • ****
  • Posts: 5.723
    • View Profile
Re: Poll: Objective Mode
« Reply #30 on: 24-12-2011, 01:12:27 »
What if Ramelle was an objective map and all you had to do was to destroy the two tigers with 1 or 2 zooks available to the Americans?

Lets not do a max payne movie. The plot already exists, why ruin it.

Ramelle 32, objective.
The tigers are NOT the objective, but they dont ever dissapear when destroyed. So they become tactical. and they dont respawn. SOMEONE will drive it.
The allies need to bleed the Germans, who will BLEED badly this time.
The Germans need to cap the otherside of the bridge

Once they cap their side of the bridge, the allies spawn the last flag across it, as well as the fact that they can blow the bridge with a vehicle plunger that spawns with the last flag. It wont stop the axis, just their armor.
And the aicrafts start to drop bombs once the Germans cap their side of the bridge.

Simple enough and yet highly engaging.

The right flank becomes crucial for armor, especially IF the allies destroy the tanks across the bottleneck.


Objective mode map Hyacinth does exist, but it really is a gemick, from a more hopeful time, when the devs were making a sequel to FH1 with all it had. Omaha, Battle of Britain, Alpenfestung.

Right now, its just not the same, and flare guns and destructible objects are just a gemick the engine allows.

But I wish they would realize it isn't so. mixing objective maps, air and sea maps etc gives it replayability.