Nah, they both had a MG34, but IIRC it could only be used by opening the loophole on the right side of the gun and sticking the MG through.
Quote from: VonMudra on 06-12-2010, 19:12:34Nah, they both had a MG34, but IIRC it could only be used by opening the loophole on the right side of the gun and sticking the MG through.I thought that only the L/70 and L/72 variants had the MG34. Surely we need one of those now or its gonna be too difficult to destroy the pesky infantry.
He got banned for our sins. He was not the member FH forums deserved, he was the member we needed.
Jagdpanther and Jagdpanzer IV had both just 1 mg in the hull
I say no to this. This means the jagdpanzer will be actually used as a tank destroyer.
Quote from: THeTA0123 on 06-12-2010, 19:12:37I say no to this. This means the jagdpanzer will be actually used as a tank destroyer. Hey they had mg's. Would you like if the Pershing suddenly didnt had mg's at all? Or if the Sexton didnt had a 50 cal to protect from infantry?
Lets analyse.Did the JPz IV have an mg in FH1?Is the model in FH2 the same as the model in FH1?Using the above answers:Will the JPz IV have an mg in FH2?
Sexton dint had a .50CALIf its a secondary seat for a MG No problemsif its a coaxial MG, no thanks
Heh, I like it how the renderer images are done exactly the same way.