I think the M5 was cuter. Same gun as LAC but had several things that were made better IMO
Quote from: Sgt.Radman on 19-02-2010, 13:02:10I think the M5 was cuter. Same gun as LAC but had several things that were made better IMOYes, I agree that the M5 is the cutest tank out of all WW2 tanks... but we were debating against the M8 and the Puma.
Well I don't find neither of em that great. They're ok but nothing past that. So I put in something in the same category that could attract the attention away from both
damn adorable
Quote from: The Warrior (CnJ) on 20-02-2010, 03:02:06damn adorableAgree, 90-100mm of armor and a shortened Panther 7.5 gun.
I don't like it that much
Quote from: Desertfox on 20-02-2010, 05:02:02 I don't like it that much Why not? Could deal with almost any late ally tank in WW2 at long rranges and was a better choice than a Marder fitting as a light tank destroyer. Sure its very small and the crew would be very uncomfortable; but nonethless a very effective tank killer, never understimate this cute fella.
that's performance, not really looks
hetzer to me looks small and fat and the gun is to one side which in human terms it means they have a ugly face
Quote from: Sgt.Radman on 19-02-2010, 21:02:01Well I don't find neither of em that great. They're ok but nothing past that. So I put in something in the same category that could attract the attention away from both Hetzer anyone?http://i24.photobucket.com/albums/c49/Yustax/edu_hetzer_boxart_lg.jpgCute little Hetzer, I wanna pinch his cheeks.
Quote from: Laffey on 20-02-2010, 10:02:07hetzer to me looks small and fat and the gun is to one side which in human terms it means they have a ugly faceYes.
