I personally hate those things... I prefer the planes to NOT have such things. Unless its hardcoded, I really would like WW2 planes to fly like WW2 planes
I don't get why a request for some slight innacuracy to aid gameplay is strongly denied with the argument 'we are aiming for realistic here' when such a silly thing goes completely unnoticed... or acceptable
Buy IL-2.
nice... we could solve all our suggestion problems this way
Yes you can, FH2 is not a damn Flight Simulator.
Hes telling you, if you want a super combined arms battle with thousand of airplanes attacking, retreating, patrolling or doing some shit, Fh2 is not your game buddy, get Il2.
Why such viciousness... I simply said I don't like the wingl-tip thing and I couldn't see why a suggestion for some slight innaccuracies for game-play would be denied for reasons of 'realism' when such an unrealistic thing as wing-tip vortices gets past the checkpoint
I mean, really, isn't there one standard? FH1 never had those things, and that was FAR from simnulator. All I'm saying is 'IF it is not hardcoded, can it be removed'
A matter of oppinion mate - Sheesh.. And I'm supposed to be one not coming from a perfect democracy
If the reason for keeping it is simply because 'the devs think it is cool', then let that be said so we can henceforth take conclusions on 'Its not in because of realism' with a pinch of salt, rather than making the minority feel we are asking for something so stupid - And howe does a request I made in a whole different thread have anything to do with tihs argument. Sometimes I wonder whether some people understand what logical falacies are when they argue
